You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> on 2020/05/28 06:33:29 UTC

Re: svn commit: r1878211 - in /subversion/branches/1.14.x: ./ STATUS subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c subversion/tests/cmdline/svnmucc_tests.py

svn-role@apache.org wrote on Thu, 28 May 2020 04:00 -0000:
> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c Thu May 28 04:00:12 2020
> @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ mtcc_verify_create(svn_client__mtcc_t *m
>  
>        if (op)
>          return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_ALREADY_EXISTS, NULL,
> -                                 _("Path '%s' already exists"),
> +                                 _("Path '%s' already exists, or was created "
> +                                   "by an earlier operation"),
>                                   new_relpath);

Is "was created" in the correct tense?  This error message is triggered
before the RA session is opened, so it shouldn't imply that the earlier
operation completed successfully.

> +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/subversion/tests/cmdline/svnmucc_tests.py Thu May 28 04:00:12 2020
> @@ -534,7 +534,8 @@ def svnmucc_type_errors(sbox):
>    xtest_svnmucc(sbox.repo_url,
> -                ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 'Z' already exists"],
> +                ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 'Z' already exists, or was created "
> +                 "by an earlier operation"],
>                  '-m', '',
>                  'mkdir', 'A/Z',
>                  'put', sbox.ospath('file'), 'A/Z')
> @@ -576,7 +577,8 @@ def svnmucc_propset_and_put(sbox):
>    # Put same file twice (non existing)
>    xtest_svnmucc(sbox.repo_url,
> -                ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 't3' already exists"],
> +                ["svnmucc: E160020: Path 't3' already exists, or was created "
> +                 "by an earlier operation"],
>                  '-m', '',
>                  'put', sbox.ospath('file'), 't3',
>                  'put', sbox.ospath('file'), 't3')

Re: svn commit: r1878211 - in /subversion/branches/1.14.x: ./ STATUS subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c subversion/tests/cmdline/svnmucc_tests.py

Posted by Johan Corveleyn <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 8:33 AM Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>
> svn-role@apache.org wrote on Thu, 28 May 2020 04:00 -0000:
> > +++ subversion/branches/1.14.x/subversion/libsvn_client/mtcc.c Thu May 28 04:00:12 2020
> > @@ -453,7 +453,8 @@ mtcc_verify_create(svn_client__mtcc_t *m
> >
> >        if (op)
> >          return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_FS_ALREADY_EXISTS, NULL,
> > -                                 _("Path '%s' already exists"),
> > +                                 _("Path '%s' already exists, or was created "
> > +                                   "by an earlier operation"),
> >                                   new_relpath);
>
> Is "was created" in the correct tense?  This error message is triggered
> before the RA session is opened, so it shouldn't imply that the earlier
> operation completed successfully.

Hmm, I completely "read over" that. But you're probably right: with
"casual user glasses" on, this might be misunderstood. Though I'm not
sure how to rephrase it to make it clear enough, yet remain succinct.

-- 
Johan