Re: looking at Crimson merge -- three suggestions

[Rajiv Mordani <Ra...@eng.sun.com>]

Hey Pier don't take all the credit ;)... It was **US** and not just you
;).. Pier ran the tests on Windows and I ran them on the ultra 5. ;)..

- Rajiv

--
:wq

On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Pierpaolo Fumagalli wrote:

> Mike Pogue wrote:
> > 
> > 1) It has been reported that the Crimson code is 50% faster than
> > Xerces-J when running on a Sparc Ultra-5, however Xerces-J is 40% faster
> > than Crimson on a Windows NT machine. It's not obvious to me why this
> > would be true!  We need to figure out WHY, so we can create a single
> > code base that is fast on BOTH.
> 
> Ok... I hate secrecy... It was me running the tests... and, kids, that's
> _TOTALLY_ unbelievable :) :) :)
> 
> 	Pier
> 
> -- 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> pier: stable structure erected over water to allow docking of seacraft
> <ma...@betaversion.org>      <http://www.betaversion.org/~pier/>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>