You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucenenet.apache.org by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> on 2012/08/06 22:55:01 UTC
3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks all,~Prescott
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Simon Svensson <si...@devhost.se>.
Hi,
It looks like there will be a 3.0.3 release sometime during the next few
days.
// Simon
On 2012-09-05 10:42, Patric Forsgard wrote:
> Hi
>
> What's the status of the prerelease package, any timeframe for taking bort
> the prerelease-flag?
>
> I use the .Net 3.5 version and the only thing I miss in the package is the
> ParalellMultiSearcher (it's only included in .net 4 package) but that was
> easy to patch from 2.9.4-version.
>
> All my application test was working without any change (if dotnetify not is
> included).
>
> // Patric
>
>
>
> On 6 August 2012 23:18, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility -
>> hopefully that gets some people excited
>> > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
>>> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
>>> Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
>>> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and
>> Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for
>> Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you
>> take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks
>> all,~Prescott
>>
>>
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Patric Forsgard <pa...@tasteful.se>.
Hi
What's the status of the prerelease package, any timeframe for taking bort
the prerelease-flag?
I use the .Net 3.5 version and the only thing I miss in the package is the
ParalellMultiSearcher (it's only included in .net 4 package) but that was
easy to patch from 2.9.4-version.
All my application test was working without any change (if dotnetify not is
included).
// Patric
On 6 August 2012 23:18, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility -
> hopefully that gets some people excited
> > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> > Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and
> Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for
> Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you
> take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks
> all,~Prescott
>
>
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Omri Suissa <om...@diffdoof.com>.
Hi Prescott,
Thanks, we want to start using Lucene.net and the .net 3.5 compatibility is
very important to us.
* Omri Suissa *
* **VP R&D*
* *
* Tel: +972 9 7724228 **DiffDoof .ltd**
*
* Cell: +972 54 5395206 **11, Galgaley Haplada
Street, *
* **Fax: +972 9 9512577** P.O.Box 2150***
* **www.DiffDoof.com* <http://www.DiffDoof.com>*
**Herzlia Pituach 46120, Israel***
On Tue, Aug 7, 2012 at 12:18 AM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility -
> hopefully that gets some people excited
> > From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> > Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and
> Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for
> Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you
> take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks
> all,~Prescott
>
>
RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility - hopefully that gets some people excited
> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks all,~Prescott
RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
I also want to point out we brought back .NET 3.5 compatibility - hopefully that gets some people excited
> From: geobmx540@hotmail.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org; lucene-net-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:55:01 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks all,~Prescott
RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Alright, that's reasonable. Shoot us an email when you've got it complete, I will cut another lucene.net.contrib pre-release package for nuget, and give the community until next weekend to vet it. Meanwhile - Does anyone know how to run RAT against the 3.0.3 branch? I'd like to get a report on that so we can fix any issues there ~P
> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 22:56:58 +0300
> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> From: itamar@code972.com
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Actively working on it as we speak, should be ready by Tuesday. Up to you :)
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
> > Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it
> > to the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at
> > finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want to
> > hold off 3.0.3 that much longer
> >
> > > Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> > > From: zgramana@gmail.com
> > > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400
> > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > >
> > > Glad to hear it.
> > >
> > > FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against
> > 2.9.4.1, which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm
> > the only one.
> > >
> > > I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is
> > included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect
> > 3.0.3 to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite
> > a bit of work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the
> > .NETification changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they
> > now have to wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy
> > coders out there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand.
> > >
> > > It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I
> > would be happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <
> > currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> > > > getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
> > > > this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into
> > > > the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
> > > > maintenance release shortly after.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Itamar Syn-Hershko <it...@code972.com>.
Actively working on it as we speak, should be ready by Tuesday. Up to you :)
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the
> Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it
> to the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at
> finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want to
> hold off 3.0.3 that much longer
>
> > Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> > From: zgramana@gmail.com
> > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400
> > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > Glad to hear it.
> >
> > FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against
> 2.9.4.1, which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm
> the only one.
> >
> > I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is
> included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect
> 3.0.3 to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite
> a bit of work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the
> .NETification changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they
> now have to wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy
> coders out there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand.
> >
> > It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I
> would be happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help.
> >
> >
> > On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <
> currens.chris@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> > > getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
> > > this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into
> > > the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
> > > maintenance release shortly after.
> >
>
>
>
RE: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com>.
Itamar - can you provide a status update on what work you've done on the Geometry stuff? If it's something that you're close on, could we commit it to the trunk and 3.0.3 branch so that the community could try their hand at finishing it? If not, I think we should move without it. I don't want to hold off 3.0.3 that much longer
> Subject: Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
> From: zgramana@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:18:17 -0400
> To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org
>
> Glad to hear it.
>
> FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against 2.9.4.1, which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm the only one.
>
> I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect 3.0.3 to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite a bit of work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the .NETification changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they now have to wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy coders out there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand.
>
> It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I would be happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help.
>
>
> On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> > getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
> > this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into
> > the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
> > maintenance release shortly after.
>
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Zachary Gramana <zg...@gmail.com>.
Glad to hear it.
FWIW, I've deployed the Spatial contrib on client projects against 2.9.4.1, which would break without the Geometry namespace. I'm doubt I'm the only one.
I would encourage not releasing the 3.0.3 Contribs.Spatial until that is included. I think most people using the stable NuGet feed would expect 3.0.3 to be complete with respect to Java Lucene. It may take people quite a bit of work to get their code working again in 3.0.3 with just the .NETification changes alone. If people find that, after all that work, they now have to wait for a maintenance release, there could be some real grumpy coders out there taking to social media with pitch forks in hand.
It sounded like he was done with 4.0 and just back porting to 3.5. I would be happy to lend Itamar a hand, if he feels it could help.
On Aug 15, 2012, at 4:29 PM, Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
> getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
> this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into
> the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
> maintenance release shortly after.
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Christopher Currens <cu...@gmail.com>.
Zachary,
That is on its way in. Itamar said a few weeks ago he was planning on
getting polygon support into the spatial module (I am assuming that
this is the Geometry namespace). I'm unsure if it will make it into
the official 3.0.3 release or it if it will be pushed back into a
maintenance release shortly after. Thanks for submitting the issue so
we can keep tabs on his progress :P
Thanks,
Christopher
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Zachary Gramana <zg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In attempting to migrate a project from 2.9.4.1 to 3.0.3, I noticed that the entire Lucene.Net.Spatial.Geometry namespace is missing.
>
> As far as Java Lucene goes, it's not marked as deprecated until 3.6 (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599).
>
> I submitted a new issue to Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-501
>
>
>
> On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks all,~Prescott
>
Re: 3.0.3 Pre-Release Nuget Packages
Posted by Zachary Gramana <zg...@gmail.com>.
In attempting to migrate a project from 2.9.4.1 to 3.0.3, I noticed that the entire Lucene.Net.Spatial.Geometry namespace is missing.
As far as Java Lucene goes, it's not marked as deprecated until 3.6 (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2599).
I submitted a new issue to Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-501
On Aug 6, 2012, at 4:55 PM, Prescott Nasser <ge...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hey All, I've hidden the two depreciated Nuget packages (Lucene and Lucene Contrib). I've also added pre-release (3.0.3-RC) Packages for Lucene.Net and Lucene.Net.Contrib. If you have time, I would ask that you take them for a test drive and provide us any feedback you have. Thanks all,~Prescott