Gump rocks was: ConcurrentModificationException

[Nick Chalko <ni...@chalko.com>]

Gump rocks.
Thanks for responding so quickly.

R,
Nick

Stefan Bodewig wrote:

>On Tue, 15 Jul 2003, Adam Jack <aj...@trysybase.com> wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Peter wrote: "revert the script test that showed up the problem in
>>the first place". Sorry, but what does this mean to the
>>non-antdev-initiated?
>>    
>>
>
>I committed a patch that was supposed to improve performance and lower
>memory consumption about a week ago.  Peter reported that one of our
>unit tests for the <script> task now failed (as it added tasks to the
>current target).
>
>We talked a little about if/how to fix it.  The outcome more or less
>was that you shouldn't be modifying the current target with <script>
>so an exception was better than relying on undefined behavior.  So we
>changed the unittest and left the situation as it was (planning to
>document it, off course).  We somehow managed to overlook the
>"top-level-target and <import>" issue.
>
>The unittest has been reverted, now that the behavior is defined.
>
>  
>
>>You can (at the least) count on us to report any failures we get to
>>the ant list. :-)
>>    
>>
>
>This is much appreciated.
>
>Stefan
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ant.apache.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ant.apache.org
>  
>