You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by "Scott Harrington (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/25 06:25:38 UTC
[jira] [Created] (LOG4J2-745) Plugins can cause ConverterKeys
collisions with unpredictable results
Scott Harrington created LOG4J2-745:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Plugins can cause ConverterKeys collisions with unpredictable results
Key: LOG4J2-745
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-745
Project: Log4j 2
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Scott Harrington
Priority: Minor
If I create a Converter plugin with ConverterKeys of "d" or "m" then there will be a collision with the built-in DatePatternConverter or MessagePatternConverter.
It is unpredictable which plugin gets used.
I see two resolutions:
(1) detect collisions in PatternParser and emit a warning so we know which implementation will be used
(2) use whichever Log4j2Plugins.dat appeared first in the CLASSPATH
Predictable iteration order is usually accomplished by replacing HashMaps with LinkedHashMaps. Could easily do this for thie PluginManager.plugins field. But PluginRegistry uses a ConcurrentHashMap.
Is there a good reason to use ConcurrentHashMaps in PluginRegistry? It doesn't really give you any concurrency -- a caller to PluginManager.getPlugins could see a partially-loaded map if collectPlugins was still running. Why not synchronize collectPlugins and/or loadPlugins, and force any concurrent caller to getPlugins to wait until the loading was complete.
I would give it a stab but I see other more important changes are probably underway for LOG4J2-741 and LOG4J2-673 and this can probably wait.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org