You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by "Kiran Ayyagari (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/09/30 17:34:07 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (DIRSERVER-1659) the apacheds.sh/bat files
contains a hard coded revision. This is not good
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13466503#comment-13466503 ]
Kiran Ayyagari commented on DIRSERVER-1659:
-------------------------------------------
so I ask this, should we keep the version number in the artifact's name? If we can drop that(using <finalName> in pom) this will be easy to solve.
> the apacheds.sh/bat files contains a hard coded revision. This is not good
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRSERVER-1659
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-1659
> Project: Directory ApacheDS
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-M3
> Reporter: Emmanuel Lecharny
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 2.0.0-M7
>
>
> Currently, we have hard coded the revision in the two batch files (service/apacheds.sh/bat).
> When we cut a release, we will likely forget to change those versions. They should be generated while we process the release, before we push the files to the tags directory.
> I don't know if it's possible though...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira