You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> on 2016/04/07 10:20:26 UTC
[VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Hi,
I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.15-beta1 (RC1).
The tag is based on r1737618 (04.04.2016) and doesn't contain commits after that -
only the changed license file.
The most notable changes in this release are:
- removal of deprecated elements (#59170)
- avoid XmlBeans calls to piccolo parser which caused OOM in rare cases (#57031)
- support for passwords longer than 15 chars for write-protection or binary formats (#59135)
- various NPE fixes in XSSF/HSSF
- fixes for color handling in XSSF and support for system colors in Common SL
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC1
What to look for?
- check the license file - I've added most of our dependencies
- check the bin/src archives - the packaging was changed for the nexus upload and so
I had to change the assembly step
- maybe run another commoncrawl test
- any other notable changes to mention
... I haven't dared to list the merge-region change again ... :)
Please vote to release the artifacts - after the vote, I'll adapt the release notes with the above.
The vote keeps open for 72hrs, 2016-04-11, 23:59 UTC,
planned release announcement date is Wednesday, 2015-04-13.
Here is my +1
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by Javen O'Neal <ja...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
Briefly tested on a POI-powered application at $dayjob.
On Apr 8, 2016 14:58, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with 3.13-final
> (what we had in Tika 1.12).
>
> Results are here:
> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
>
> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks like no
> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt and pptx!
>
> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There are a
> few files that will require further investigation on content loss...some of
> that may be Tika's fault. See
> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I subtracted
> commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good way to find docs that
> lost content.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> To: dev@poi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
>
> Andi
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-15-beta1-release-RC1-tp5722647p5722677.html
> Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
This vote has passed with 4x PMC +1 votes.
I release the artifacts now and announce the release on the website,
when I see the files on maven central.
Andi
(posted it twice, to keep it in the 3.15-beta1 vote thread ...)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by Javen O'Neal <ja...@gmail.com>.
Tested RC2 without any problems on an POI-powered application at $dayjob.
+1.
On Apr 11, 2016 8:08 AM, "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org> wrote:
> +1 (relying on tests for RC1) and successful build of RC2.
>
> Thank you, Andi, for running this release!
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stadler@gmx.at]
> Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 5:58 AM
> To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
>
> Ok, then +1 from me!
>
> Thanks... Dominik
>
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Dominik,
> >
> > I've renamed it to beta1 [1] now - the reason for it was, that the svn
> > commit was via the new ant scripts where I've forgotten to specify the
> > -Dversion.id and -DDSTAMP, but the content should be ok.
> >
> > Andi.
> >
> > [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC2
> >
> > On 10.04.2016 08:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> > > Hi Andi,
> > >
> > > the "beta2" in the filenames/directories looks incorrect, or?
> > >
> > > Dominik.
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Beeker
> > > <ki...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes:
> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its
> > >> better
> > to
> > >> be safe than ...
> > >>
> > >> Andi.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> > >>> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with
> > >>> 3.13-final
> > >> (what we had in Tika 1.12).
> > >>> Results are here:
> > >>> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
> > >>>
> > >>> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks
> > >>> like
> > no
> > >> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt
> > >> and
> > pptx!
> > >>> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There
> > >>> are a
> > >> few files that will require further investigation on content
> > loss...some of
> > >> that may be Tika's fault. See
> > >> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I
> > >> subtracted commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good
> > >> way to find docs
> > that
> > >> lost content.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
> > >>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> > >>> To: dev@poi.apache.org
> > >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi All,
> > >>>
> > >>> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
> > >>> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
> > >>>
> > >>> Andi
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For
> > >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional
> > commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
+1 (relying on tests for RC1) and successful build of RC2.
Thank you, Andi, for running this release!
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominik Stadler [mailto:dominik.stadler@gmx.at]
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2016 5:58 AM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Ok, then +1 from me!
Thanks... Dominik
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> I've renamed it to beta1 [1] now - the reason for it was, that the svn
> commit was via the new ant scripts where I've forgotten to specify the
> -Dversion.id and -DDSTAMP, but the content should be ok.
>
> Andi.
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC2
>
> On 10.04.2016 08:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> > Hi Andi,
> >
> > the "beta2" in the filenames/directories looks incorrect, or?
> >
> > Dominik.
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Beeker
> > <ki...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2
> >>
> >> I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its
> >> better
> to
> >> be safe than ...
> >>
> >> Andi.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> >>> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with
> >>> 3.13-final
> >> (what we had in Tika 1.12).
> >>> Results are here:
> >>> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
> >>>
> >>> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks
> >>> like
> no
> >> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt
> >> and
> pptx!
> >>> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There
> >>> are a
> >> few files that will require further investigation on content
> loss...some of
> >> that may be Tika's fault. See
> >> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I
> >> subtracted commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good
> >> way to find docs
> that
> >> lost content.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
> >>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> >>> To: dev@poi.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
> >>> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
> >>>
> >>> Andi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For
> >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Ok, then +1 from me!
Thanks... Dominik
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> I've renamed it to beta1 [1] now - the reason for it was, that the svn
> commit was via the new ant scripts
> where I've forgotten to specify the -Dversion.id and -DDSTAMP, but the
> content should be ok.
>
> Andi.
>
> [1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC2
>
> On 10.04.2016 08:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> > Hi Andi,
> >
> > the "beta2" in the filenames/directories looks incorrect, or?
> >
> > Dominik.
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes:
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2
> >>
> >> I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its better
> to
> >> be safe than ...
> >>
> >> Andi.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> >>> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with 3.13-final
> >> (what we had in Tika 1.12).
> >>> Results are here:
> >>> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
> >>>
> >>> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks like
> no
> >> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt and
> pptx!
> >>> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There are a
> >> few files that will require further investigation on content
> loss...some of
> >> that may be Tika's fault. See
> >> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I subtracted
> >> commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good way to find docs
> that
> >> lost content.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
> >>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> >>> To: dev@poi.apache.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
> >>>
> >>> Hi All,
> >>>
> >>> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
> >>> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
> >>>
> >>> Andi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi Dominik,
I've renamed it to beta1 [1] now - the reason for it was, that the svn commit was via the new ant scripts
where I've forgotten to specify the -Dversion.id and -DDSTAMP, but the content should be ok.
Andi.
[1] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC2
On 10.04.2016 08:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> the "beta2" in the filenames/directories looks incorrect, or?
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2
>>
>> I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its better to
>> be safe than ...
>>
>> Andi.
>>
>>
>> On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
>>> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with 3.13-final
>> (what we had in Tika 1.12).
>>> Results are here:
>>> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks like no
>> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt and pptx!
>>> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There are a
>> few files that will require further investigation on content loss...some of
>> that may be Tika's fault. See
>> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I subtracted
>> commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good way to find docs that
>> lost content.
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
>>> To: dev@poi.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
>>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
>>> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
>>>
>>> Andi
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi Andi,
the "beta2" in the filenames/directories looks incorrect, or?
Dominik.
On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2
>
> I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its better to
> be safe than ...
>
> Andi.
>
>
> On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> > I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with 3.13-final
> (what we had in Tika 1.12).
> >
> > Results are here:
> > http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
> >
> > I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks like no
> major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt and pptx!
> >
> > Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There are a
> few files that will require further investigation on content loss...some of
> that may be Tika's fault. See
> contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I subtracted
> commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good way to find docs that
> lost content.
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
> > Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> > To: dev@poi.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
> > If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
[VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC2)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi,
I've prepared another release candidate with Tims changes:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta2-RC2
I'm not sure how often this error would happen, but I guess its better to be safe than ...
Andi.
On 08.04.2016 23:58, Allison, Timothy B. wrote:
> I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with 3.13-final (what we had in Tika 1.12).
>
> Results are here:
> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
>
> I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks like no major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt and pptx!
>
> Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There are a few files that will require further investigation on content loss...some of that may be Tika's fault. See contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I subtracted commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good way to find docs that lost content.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
> To: dev@poi.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
>
> Hi All,
>
> Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
> If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
>
> Andi
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
I just finished the run. This compares 3.15-beta1-rc1 with 3.13-final (what we had in Tika 1.12).
Results are here:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_3_15-beta1-rc1.tar.bz2
I've only had a chance to look at the results briefly...it looks like no major issues. We're getting quite a bit more content out of ppt and pptx!
Overall, we're extracting ~500k more common English words. There are a few files that will require further investigation on content loss...some of that may be Tika's fault. See contents/content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx. I found if I subtracted commonA from commonB and then sorted, that was a good way to find docs that lost content.
-----Original Message-----
From: kiwiwings [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 11:41 AM
To: dev@poi.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Hi All,
Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
Andi
--
View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-15-beta1-release-RC1-tp5722647p5722677.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by kiwiwings <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi All,
Is it ok, to create RC2 from the trunk?
If not, I'll apply Tims changes to the 3.15-beta1 tag.
Andi
--
View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-15-beta1-release-RC1-tp5722647p5722677.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by kiwiwings <ki...@apache.org>.
Allison, Timothy B. wrote
> ZipPackage is fixed in r 1738251.
>
> I'm going to try to run regular regression tests with rc1 as it is now.
>
> ....
>
> B KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB
> [ X ܚX KK[XZ[ ] ][ X ܚX P K \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[
> K[XZ[ ] Z[ K \X K ܙ B B
Thank you for the fix - when I've written the workaround I thought, this
case is so rare,
either the file can't be accessed (and therefore closing it is futile) or
the resource is closed
when the zippackage is closed ...
At least I can validate my release scripts now.
Btw. what's the meaning of your signature? ... I also have currently
problems with my laptop keyboard (http://bit.ly/1WhSa2z), but usually remove
those before posting ;)
--
View this message in context: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/VOTE-Apache-POI-3-15-beta1-release-RC1-tp5722647p5722676.html
Sent from the POI - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
ZipPackage is fixed in r 1738251.
I'm going to try to run regular regression tests with rc1 as it is now.
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:tallison@mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 9:50 AM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
One of our unit tests on Tika is failing because we (POI) aren't closing the FileInputStream if there's a second exception in ZipPackage. r1736933
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:tallison@mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 8:17 AM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
I'm getting a test failure on Windows 7
java version "1.8.0_77"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_77-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode)
I'm not getting this failure in Linux with java 1.8.0_71
Testsuite: org.apache.poi.hmef.TestAttachments
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.058 sec
Testcase: testBasicAttachments took 0.032 sec
Testcase: testAttachmentContents took 0.013 sec
FAILED
expected:<445> but was:<428>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<445> but was:<428>
at org.apache.poi.hmef.HMEFTest.assertContents(HMEFTest.java:42)
at org.apache.poi.hmef.HMEFTest.assertContents(HMEFTest.java:34)
at org.apache.poi.hmef.TestAttachments.testAttachmentContents(TestAttachments.java:113)
Also, it looks like the extraction test of 46515.xls is leaving behind a directory underneath the main directory: poi-3.15-beta1/46515.xls/Root Entry/...
Probably from TestPOIFsDump?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Beeker [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 4:20 AM
To: dev@poi.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Hi,
I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.15-beta1 (RC1).
The tag is based on r1737618 (04.04.2016) and doesn't contain commits after that - only the changed license file.
The most notable changes in this release are:
- removal of deprecated elements (#59170)
- avoid XmlBeans calls to piccolo parser which caused OOM in rare cases (#57031)
- support for passwords longer than 15 chars for write-protection or binary formats (#59135)
- various NPE fixes in XSSF/HSSF
- fixes for color handling in XSSF and support for system colors in Common SL
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC1
What to look for?
- check the license file - I've added most of our dependencies
- check the bin/src archives - the packaging was changed for the nexus upload and so
I had to change the assembly step
- maybe run another commoncrawl test
- any other notable changes to mention
... I haven't dared to list the merge-region change again ... :)
Please vote to release the artifacts - after the vote, I'll adapt the release notes with the above.
The vote keeps open for 72hrs, 2016-04-11, 23:59 UTC, planned release announcement date is Wednesday, 2015-04-13.
Here is my +1
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
B KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB [ X ܚX KK[XZ[ ] ][ X ܚX P K \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[ ] Z[ K \X K ܙ B B
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
One of our unit tests on Tika is failing because we (POI) aren't closing the FileInputStream if there's a second exception in ZipPackage. r1736933
-----Original Message-----
From: Allison, Timothy B. [mailto:tallison@mitre.org]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 8:17 AM
To: POI Developers List <de...@poi.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
I'm getting a test failure on Windows 7
java version "1.8.0_77"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_77-b03) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode)
I'm not getting this failure in Linux with java 1.8.0_71
Testsuite: org.apache.poi.hmef.TestAttachments
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.058 sec
Testcase: testBasicAttachments took 0.032 sec
Testcase: testAttachmentContents took 0.013 sec
FAILED
expected:<445> but was:<428>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<445> but was:<428>
at org.apache.poi.hmef.HMEFTest.assertContents(HMEFTest.java:42)
at org.apache.poi.hmef.HMEFTest.assertContents(HMEFTest.java:34)
at org.apache.poi.hmef.TestAttachments.testAttachmentContents(TestAttachments.java:113)
Also, it looks like the extraction test of 46515.xls is leaving behind a directory underneath the main directory: poi-3.15-beta1/46515.xls/Root Entry/...
Probably from TestPOIFsDump?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Beeker [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 4:20 AM
To: dev@poi.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Hi,
I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.15-beta1 (RC1).
The tag is based on r1737618 (04.04.2016) and doesn't contain commits after that - only the changed license file.
The most notable changes in this release are:
- removal of deprecated elements (#59170)
- avoid XmlBeans calls to piccolo parser which caused OOM in rare cases (#57031)
- support for passwords longer than 15 chars for write-protection or binary formats (#59135)
- various NPE fixes in XSSF/HSSF
- fixes for color handling in XSSF and support for system colors in Common SL
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC1
What to look for?
- check the license file - I've added most of our dependencies
- check the bin/src archives - the packaging was changed for the nexus upload and so
I had to change the assembly step
- maybe run another commoncrawl test
- any other notable changes to mention
... I haven't dared to list the merge-region change again ... :)
Please vote to release the artifacts - after the vote, I'll adapt the release notes with the above.
The vote keeps open for 72hrs, 2016-04-11, 23:59 UTC, planned release announcement date is Wednesday, 2015-04-13.
Here is my +1
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
B KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB [ X ܚX KK[XZ[
] ][ X ܚX P K \X K ܙ B ܈Y][ۘ[ [X[ K[XZ[
] Z[ K \X K ܙ B B
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by "Allison, Timothy B." <ta...@mitre.org>.
I'm getting a test failure on Windows 7
java version "1.8.0_77"
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_77-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.77-b03, mixed mode)
I'm not getting this failure in Linux with java 1.8.0_71
Testsuite: org.apache.poi.hmef.TestAttachments
Tests run: 2, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.058 sec
Testcase: testBasicAttachments took 0.032 sec
Testcase: testAttachmentContents took 0.013 sec
FAILED
expected:<445> but was:<428>
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: expected:<445> but was:<428>
at org.apache.poi.hmef.HMEFTest.assertContents(HMEFTest.java:42)
at org.apache.poi.hmef.HMEFTest.assertContents(HMEFTest.java:34)
at org.apache.poi.hmef.TestAttachments.testAttachmentContents(TestAttachments.java:113)
Also, it looks like the extraction test of 46515.xls is leaving behind a directory underneath the main directory: poi-3.15-beta1/46515.xls/Root Entry/...
Probably from TestPOIFsDump?
-----Original Message-----
From: Andreas Beeker [mailto:kiwiwings@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2016 4:20 AM
To: dev@poi.apache.org
Subject: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Hi,
I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.15-beta1 (RC1).
The tag is based on r1737618 (04.04.2016) and doesn't contain commits after that - only the changed license file.
The most notable changes in this release are:
- removal of deprecated elements (#59170)
- avoid XmlBeans calls to piccolo parser which caused OOM in rare cases (#57031)
- support for passwords longer than 15 chars for write-protection or binary formats (#59135)
- various NPE fixes in XSSF/HSSF
- fixes for color handling in XSSF and support for system colors in Common SL
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC1
What to look for?
- check the license file - I've added most of our dependencies
- check the bin/src archives - the packaging was changed for the nexus upload and so
I had to change the assembly step
- maybe run another commoncrawl test
- any other notable changes to mention
... I haven't dared to list the merge-region change again ... :)
Please vote to release the artifacts - after the vote, I'll adapt the release notes with the above.
The vote keeps open for 72hrs, 2016-04-11, 23:59 UTC, planned release announcement date is Wednesday, 2015-04-13.
Here is my +1
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15-beta1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
I am +1, content looks good compared to 3.14, checksum match, ...
One minor thing: The version-number in the Sonar-pom.xml files in the
src-packages is already at "beta2", not sure how it ended up there, but I
don't think it causes any hard as these are only used for our internal
Sonar checks and thus are not used for any versioning/packaging at all.
Dominik.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 3.15-beta1 (RC1).
> The tag is based on r1737618 (04.04.2016) and doesn't contain commits
> after that -
> only the changed license file.
>
> The most notable changes in this release are:
>
> - removal of deprecated elements (#59170)
> - avoid XmlBeans calls to piccolo parser which caused OOM in rare cases
> (#57031)
> - support for passwords longer than 15 chars for write-protection or
> binary formats (#59135)
> - various NPE fixes in XSSF/HSSF
> - fixes for color handling in XSSF and support for system colors in Common
> SL
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-beta1-RC1
>
> What to look for?
> - check the license file - I've added most of our dependencies
> - check the bin/src archives - the packaging was changed for the nexus
> upload and so
> I had to change the assembly step
> - maybe run another commoncrawl test
> - any other notable changes to mention
> ... I haven't dared to list the merge-region change again ... :)
>
>
> Please vote to release the artifacts - after the vote, I'll adapt the
> release notes with the above.
>
> The vote keeps open for 72hrs, 2016-04-11, 23:59 UTC,
> planned release announcement date is Wednesday, 2015-04-13.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Andi
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>