You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@servicemix.apache.org by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/10/07 22:57:52 UTC
[jira] Created: (SM-1619) When OSGi components are deployed in smx4
and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not
available
When OSGi components are deployed in smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not available
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: SM-1619
URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619
Project: ServiceMix
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
This can lead to several problems.
One of these is that using a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer won't work because there will be a ClassNotFound exception
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SM-1619) When OSGi components are deployed in
smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are
not available
Posted by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=46250#action_46250 ]
Guillaume Nodet commented on SM-1619:
-------------------------------------
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702708.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702709.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702710.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702711.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702712.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702713.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702714.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702715.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702716.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702717.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702718.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702719.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702720.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702721.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702722.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702723.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702724.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702725.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702726.
Sending pom.xml
Transmitting file data .
Committed revision 702727.
> When OSGi components are deployed in smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not available
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
>
> This can lead to several problems.
> One of these is that using a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer won't work because there will be a ClassNotFound exception
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SM-1619) When OSGi components are deployed in smx4
and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not
available
Posted by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-1619:
--------------------------------
Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
Fix Version/s: servicemix-bean-2008.02
servicemix-camel-2008.02
servicemix-cxf-se-2008.02
servicemix-drools-2008.02
servicemix-eip-2008.02
servicemix-jsr181-2008.02
servicemix-osworkflow-2008.02
servicemix-xmpp-2008.02
servicemix-quartz-2008.02
servicemix-saxon-2008.02
servicemix-script-2008.02
servicemix-scripting-2008.02
servicemix-validation-2008.02
servicemix-wsn2005-2008.02
servicemix-cxf-bc-2008.02
servicemix-file-2008.02
servicemix-ftp-2008.02
servicemix-http-2008.02
servicemix-jms-2008.02
servicemix-mail-2008.02
servicemix-truezip-2008.02
> When OSGi components are deployed in smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not available
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
> Fix For: servicemix-bean-2008.02, servicemix-camel-2008.02, servicemix-cxf-se-2008.02, servicemix-drools-2008.02, servicemix-eip-2008.02, servicemix-jsr181-2008.02, servicemix-osworkflow-2008.02, servicemix-quartz-2008.02, servicemix-saxon-2008.02, servicemix-script-2008.02, servicemix-scripting-2008.02, servicemix-validation-2008.02, servicemix-wsn2005-2008.02, servicemix-cxf-bc-2008.02, servicemix-file-2008.02, servicemix-ftp-2008.02, servicemix-http-2008.02, servicemix-jms-2008.02, servicemix-mail-2008.02, servicemix-truezip-2008.02, servicemix-xmpp-2008.02
>
>
> This can lead to several problems.
> One of these is that using a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer won't work because there will be a ClassNotFound exception
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SM-1619) When OSGi components are deployed in smx4
and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not
available
Posted by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Guillaume Nodet updated SM-1619:
--------------------------------
Fix Version/s: servicemix-xmpp-2008.01
servicemix-wsn2005-2008.01
servicemix-validation-2008.01
servicemix-truezip-2008.01
servicemix-scripting-2008.01
servicemix-script-2008.01
servicemix-saxon-2008.01
servicemix-quartz-2008.01
servicemix-osworkflow-2008.01
servicemix-mail-2008.01
servicemix-jsr181-2008.01
servicemix-jms-2008.01
servicemix-http-2008.01
servicemix-ftp-2008.01
servicemix-file-2008.01
servicemix-eip-2008.01
servicemix-drools-2008.01
servicemix-cxf-se-2008.01
servicemix-cxf-bc-2008.01
servicemix-camel-2008.01
servicemix-bean-2008.01
(was: servicemix-eip-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-bean-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-wsn2005-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-camel-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-cxf-se-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-drools-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-jsr181-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-osworkflow-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-quartz-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-saxon-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-script-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-scripting-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-validation-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-cxf-bc-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-file-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-ftp-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-http-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-jms-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-mail-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-truezip-2008.02)
(was: servicemix-xmpp-2008.02)
> When OSGi components are deployed in smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not available
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
> Fix For: servicemix-bean-2008.01, servicemix-camel-2008.01, servicemix-cxf-bc-2008.01, servicemix-cxf-se-2008.01, servicemix-drools-2008.01, servicemix-eip-2008.01, servicemix-file-2008.01, servicemix-ftp-2008.01, servicemix-http-2008.01, servicemix-jms-2008.01, servicemix-jsr181-2008.01, servicemix-mail-2008.01, servicemix-osworkflow-2008.01, servicemix-quartz-2008.01, servicemix-saxon-2008.01, servicemix-script-2008.01, servicemix-scripting-2008.01, servicemix-truezip-2008.01, servicemix-validation-2008.01, servicemix-wsn2005-2008.01, servicemix-xmpp-2008.01
>
>
> This can lead to several problems.
> One of these is that using a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer won't work because there will be a ClassNotFound exception
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (SM-1619) When OSGi components are deployed in
smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are
not available
Posted by "Guillaume Nodet (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Guillaume Nodet resolved SM-1619.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> When OSGi components are deployed in smx4 and an SA is deployed using the JBI packaging, the spring classes are not available
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SM-1619
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/SM-1619
> Project: ServiceMix
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Guillaume Nodet
> Assignee: Guillaume Nodet
> Fix For: servicemix-bean-2008.02, servicemix-camel-2008.02, servicemix-cxf-se-2008.02, servicemix-drools-2008.02, servicemix-eip-2008.02, servicemix-jsr181-2008.02, servicemix-osworkflow-2008.02, servicemix-quartz-2008.02, servicemix-saxon-2008.02, servicemix-script-2008.02, servicemix-scripting-2008.02, servicemix-validation-2008.02, servicemix-wsn2005-2008.02, servicemix-cxf-bc-2008.02, servicemix-file-2008.02, servicemix-ftp-2008.02, servicemix-http-2008.02, servicemix-jms-2008.02, servicemix-mail-2008.02, servicemix-truezip-2008.02, servicemix-xmpp-2008.02
>
>
> This can lead to several problems.
> One of these is that using a PropertyPlaceholderConfigurer won't work because there will be a ClassNotFound exception
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.