Re: Avoid blocking producers

[Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>]

Hi Chris,

we are currently ironing out all remaining issues so we can feel  
comfortable calling for a vote for a GA release of ActiveMQ very  
soon. We want to actively start discussing the changes required on  
the dev list - but want to get 4.0 settled first. So if you could  
bear with us for another week or two we'd appreciate it. Currently  
there are no  design docs as such - but we'll pass one around soon  
for discussion.

cheers,

Rob

On 28 Apr 2006, at 20:25, Larrieu, Christopher wrote:

> Great!  But what exactly does "side-by-side" mean?  Does this imply  
> that whatever changes you make will be swappable with existing  
> code?  Are there any design documents that we can review in order  
> to understand how your improvements will affect our goals and/or  
> meet our needs?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Rob Davies [mailto:rajdavies@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, April 28, 2006 1:34 AM
>> To: activemq-dev@geronimo.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Avoid blocking producers
>>
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> we are planning on prototyping this for 4.1 and will do this
>> side-by- side to the existing implementation. We should have
>> the first cut implemented in the next  couple of months - but
>> any contributions are welcome!
>>
>> cheers,
>>
>> Rob
>>
>> On 27 Apr 2006, at 23:32, Larrieu, Christopher wrote:
>>
>>> Rob,
>>>
>>> In response to JIRA issue https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/
>>> AMQ-688#action_36051 you mentioned that you are looking into some
>>> major changes for decoupling producers and consumers, as well as
>>> implementing the staged feeding of dispatch queues.  Much of this
>>> coincides with work that we need in order to use ActiveMQ
>> effectively
>>> in our organization.  If we were to move forward
>> independently without
>>> collaborating, we'd end up arriving with wildly divergent results.
>>>
>>> Can you provide some more details, so that we can plan accordingly?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>

Rob Davies
http://rajdavies.blogspot.com/