You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Richard S. Hall (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/11 18:05:47 UTC

[jira] Updated: (FELIX-2662) [Gogo] Consider more fully qualified configuration property names

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2662?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Richard S. Hall updated FELIX-2662:
-----------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: gogo.runtime-0.8.0)
                   gogo.shell-0.10.0

> [Gogo] Consider more fully qualified configuration property names
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-2662
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-2662
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Gogo Shell
>    Affects Versions: gogo-0.6.1
>            Reporter: Richard S. Hall
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: gogo.shell-0.10.0
>
>
> I am not sure if this applies to the other Gogo modules, but Gogo Shell uses configuration property names like "gosh.args" and "gosh.home", but these should likely be more fully qualified names. For the framework, we've typically used names like "felix.*" although one could argue for "org.apache.felix.*"...I think the former is sufficient.
> For the precise names, it is not clear if they should be felix.gosh.args or felix.gogo.shell.args...I assume if the runtime has config properties they would be felix.gogo.runtime.*... We just need to think about this and make things consistent and meaningful.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.