You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by "Bryan Beaudreault (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/06/04 17:56:19 UTC
[jira] [Created] (BOOKKEEPER-618) Better resolution of bookie
address
Bryan Beaudreault created BOOKKEEPER-618:
--------------------------------------------
Summary: Better resolution of bookie address
Key: BOOKKEEPER-618
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BOOKKEEPER-618
Project: Bookkeeper
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: bookkeeper-server
Affects Versions: 4.2.1
Reporter: Bryan Beaudreault
Priority: Minor
Bookie#getBookieAddress uses the following code:
{code:title=Bookie.java}
/**
* Return the configured address of the bookie.
*/
public static InetSocketAddress getBookieAddress(ServerConfiguration conf)
throws UnknownHostException {
return new InetSocketAddress(InetAddress.getLocalHost()
.getHostAddress(), conf.getBookiePort());
}
{code}
This code is subject to the contents of one's /etc/hosts file, in that if they have an entry like {{ 127.0.0.1 myhostname }}, this method will return the same 127.0.0.1 address on all bookie servers. This causes conflicts due to the way bookies register in zookeeper.
There should be an optional bk_server.conf setting to allow one to select their preferred network interface to use for the bookie. Then you could use something like {{ NetworkInterface.getByName(PREFERRED_INTERFACE).getInetAddresses() }} instead. This method is not effected by the /etc/hosts.
An alternative method of registering the bookie that does not rely on the local address would be another possible solution, such as using the DNS like other apache projects (hbase).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira