[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Apache FlexJS 0.6.0 RC1

[Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>]

Canceling because of the font licenses.  The next RC will try to make them
an option in the installer (and not bundled in the packages).  Hold on to
your hat!

-Alex

On 3/29/16, 12:22 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@me.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Sorry -1 binding due to possible license issues and unable to compile
>from source. Willing to change vote to +1 if these are sorted.
>
>I checked:
>- Signatures and hashes good
>- Source NOTICE is OK
>- Source LICENSE has some minor issues (see below)
>- Binary NOTICE is OK
>- Binary LICENSE same mine issues as source and missing Flat UI font
>licenses
>- Docs LICENSE file is incorrect as it list things it doesn’t contain
>- Docs NOTICE is OK
>- Docs NOTICE and LICENSE good
>- All source files have Apache headers
>- Unable to compile from source not sure what the issue is - may be Java
>version related
>
>I see a lot of projects using sha rather than md5 these days, md5 is
>considered not as secure as it once was. We may want to consider this for
>future releases.
>
>Source LICENSE refers to frameworks/projects/Flat/as/defaults.css this
>files doesn’t exist I assume it is
>frameworks/projects/Flat/src/main/resources/defaults.css instead?
>
>Source LICENSE refers to examples/native/USStatesMap/src/MapCoords.js
>this file doesn't exist I assume it is
>examples/native/USStatesMap/src/MapCoords.as instead? (note different
>extension)
>
>In the binary it’s a little unclear how the the flat ui font files are
>licensed (flat-ui-icons-regular.eot, flat-ui-icons-regular.swf,
>flat-ui-icons-regular.ttf, flat-ui-icons-regular.woff,
>lat-ui-icons-regular.svg), it look like they may be under a non
>commercial CC license.
>
>The AS docs LICENSE looks to be incorrect as it’s a copy of source one
>and list things not contained in the package.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
>