You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2026/10/20 08:04:00 UTC
[jira] [Closed] (OAK-12100) Queries with nodeName don't run efficiently (estimated cost is too high)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-12100?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Julian Reschke closed OAK-12100.
--------------------------------
> Queries with nodeName don't run efficiently (estimated cost is too high)
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-12100
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-12100
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: lucene, query
> Reporter: Thomas Mueller
> Assignee: Thomas Mueller
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.8.0
>
>
> The following query:
> {noformat}
> SELECT * FROM [acme:Asset] AS asset
> WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE(asset, '/content')
> AND (NAME(asset) = 'berne'
> OR asset.[jcr:content/metadata/alias] = 'running'
> OR asset.[jcr:uuid] = 'running')
> {noformat}
> with jcr:content/metadata/alias and jcr:uuid are both configured in the definition with propertyIndex=true .
> When run, it uses an index but it only uses the path filter (ancestor).
> And when removing the filter on nodeName, the filter on alias is applied at index level.
> Removing the filter on alias and jcr:uuid : the filter on nodeName is applied at index level.
> Why jcr:uuid is never used in the query even if configured as property index?
> The same behaviour happens on both elastic and lucene. It may be a problem is in the query engine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)