You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cayenne.apache.org by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> on 2011/02/23 12:35:45 UTC
[VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
Please evaluate and cast your votes.
Cheers,
Andrus
Re: Modeler issues
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Here is the spew:
CayenneModeler Info
Version: 3.1M2
Build Date: Feb 21 2011 12:19:50
Exception:
=================================
java.lang.NullPointerException
at org.apache.cayenne.modeler.dialog.ConfirmRemoveDialog.showDialog(ConfirmRemoveDialog.java:65)
at org.apache.cayenne.modeler.dialog.ConfirmRemoveDialog.shouldDelete(ConfirmRemoveDialog.java:95)
at org.apache.cayenne.modeler.dialog.ConfirmRemoveDialog.shouldDelete(ConfirmRemoveDialog.java:80)
at org.apache.cayenne.modeler.action.RemoveAttributeAction.performAction(RemoveAttributeAction.java:132)
at org.apache.cayenne.modeler.action.RemoveAction.performAction(RemoveAction.java:102)
at org.apache.cayenne.modeler.util.CayenneAction.actionPerformed(CayenneAction.java:162)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton.fireActionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2012)
at javax.swing.AbstractButton$Handler.actionPerformed(AbstractButton.java:2335)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.fireActionPerformed(DefaultButtonModel.java:404)
at javax.swing.DefaultButtonModel.setPressed(DefaultButtonModel.java:259)
at javax.swing.plaf.basic.BasicButtonListener.mouseReleased(BasicButtonListener.java:253)
at java.awt.AWTEventMulticaster.mouseReleased(AWTEventMulticaster.java:289)
at java.awt.Component.processMouseEvent(Component.java:6175)
at javax.swing.JComponent.processMouseEvent(JComponent.java:3267)
at java.awt.Component.processEvent(Component.java:5940)
at java.awt.Container.processEvent(Container.java:2105)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEventImpl(Component.java:4536)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2163)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4362)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.retargetMouseEvent(Container.java:4461)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.processMouseEvent(Container.java:4125)
at java.awt.LightweightDispatcher.dispatchEvent(Container.java:4055)
at java.awt.Container.dispatchEventImpl(Container.java:2149)
at java.awt.Window.dispatchEventImpl(Window.java:2478)
at java.awt.Component.dispatchEvent(Component.java:4362)
at java.awt.EventQueue.dispatchEvent(EventQueue.java:604)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpOneEventForFilters(EventDispatchThread.java:275)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForFilter(EventDispatchThread.java:200)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEventsForHierarchy(EventDispatchThread.java:190)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:185)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.pumpEvents(EventDispatchThread.java:177)
at java.awt.EventDispatchThread.run(EventDispatchThread.java:138)
Re: Modeler issues
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
> On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> The first time I tried to delete an attribute in the modeler it
>> opened an empty confirm window. Clicking the close button (on the
>> window, because the confirm window was empty) threw an exception. I
>> couldn't reproduce this.
>
> Do you have a stack trace for it? (often those are printed in the OSX Console).
Yes, but it is at home. I can post it later. And I was on Linux at
the time (Ubuntu). First time I had ever run the modeler on Linux,
too. Not sure if that is related or not, though.
>> Also, when creating a custom test model, I
>> accidentally tried to create a relationship name with the same name as
>> an attribute. Clicking the "Done" button in the relationship
>> inspector didn't do anything. Clicking it again closed the window,
>> but the relationship didn't exist. This should probably produce a
>> warning of some kind as it took me several attempts to realize my
>> mistake.
>
> IIRC we didn't handle it well in 3.0 either. I wish we implement some "inline" error messages, like Eclipse does - just show an error in the same window while the user is typing.
That's kind of what I was thinking, but I haven't thought through it a
whole lot yet.
Thanks,
mrg
Modeler issues
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Mar 3, 2011, at 6:07 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> The first time I tried to delete an attribute in the modeler it
> opened an empty confirm window. Clicking the close button (on the
> window, because the confirm window was empty) threw an exception. I
> couldn't reproduce this.
Do you have a stack trace for it? (often those are printed in the OSX Console).
> Also, when creating a custom test model, I
> accidentally tried to create a relationship name with the same name as
> an attribute. Clicking the "Done" button in the relationship
> inspector didn't do anything. Clicking it again closed the window,
> but the relationship didn't exist. This should probably produce a
> warning of some kind as it took me several attempts to realize my
> mistake.
IIRC we didn't handle it well in 3.0 either. I wish we implement some "inline" error messages, like Eclipse does - just show an error in the same window while the user is typing.
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Outside of a few glitches in the modeler*, everything I checked was
fine. MD5 checksums matched. Source compiled to the same binary as
the distribution (not counting timestamp/author differences). All
test cases ran. Custom test application ran.
+1 for a milestone release.
Thanks,
mrg
* The first time I tried to delete an attribute in the modeler it
opened an empty confirm window. Clicking the close button (on the
window, because the confirm window was empty) threw an exception. I
couldn't reproduce this. Also, when creating a custom test model, I
accidentally tried to create a relationship name with the same name as
an attribute. Clicking the "Done" button in the relationship
inspector didn't do anything. Clicking it again closed the window,
but the relationship didn't exist. This should probably produce a
warning of some kind as it took me several attempts to realize my
mistake.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
+1
On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrus
Re: [CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I published the release and updated the Downloads page. Will need to formulate the announcement text now.
Andrus
On Mar 4, 2011, at 9:27 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> I am closing the vote. We have 3 PMC +1 votes and no other votes:
>
> Andrey Razumovsky +1
> Michael Gentry +1
> Andrus Adamchik +1
>
> I am officially closing the vote. The release is approved and I am going to publish it shortly.
>
> Andrus
>
> On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>
>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andrus
>
>
[CLOSED] Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
I am closing the vote. We have 3 PMC +1 votes and no other votes:
Andrey Razumovsky +1
Michael Gentry +1
Andrus Adamchik +1
I am officially closing the vote. The release is approved and I am going to publish it shortly.
Andrus
On Feb 23, 2011, at 1:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Trying to build the source, but having trouble with mockito (which
means it is probably blocked here at work). I'll have to try again
from home.
mrg
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 6:35 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Robert Zeigler <ro...@roxanemy.com>.
I'll see if I can take a look at it tonight, as a non-binding vote. :)
GATAATGCTATTTCTTTAATTTTCGAA
On Mar 1, 2011, at 9:38 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Very cool.
>
> And we need just one more volunteer.
>
> (BTW, committers who are not PMC members are more than welcome to evaluate the release and vote on it as well. It won't be a binding vote, but it will still be very valuable.)
>
> Andrus
>
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrus,
>>
>> My intention is to check it out tonight from home since I can't seem
>> to build at work. I was going to do that last night, but was overcome
>> by events.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> Actually we need 3 PMC +1's to make it an Apache release. I don't think we can bypass that. So I have no problem if voting takes more time, but we do it properly.
>>>
>>> What about other PMC members - who else can take a look at it?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>>>
>>>> My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
>>>>
>>>> Ari
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------->
>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Andrey Razumovsky wrote:
> * Should we close/retarget single issue left for M2 in JIRA? [1]
Done
> * Is it fine to release with obsolete (2010) license year in CM
> "About" dialog (I'll change that in trunk right now)
IMO this is fine. After all there's no hard requirement to display this copyright in the Modeler at all.
Andrus
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrey Razumovsky <ra...@gmail.com>.
I'm +1. I don't use that anywhere in production, but I've played with
the modeler and have addressed source code recently. The issues fixed
look very improtant, so we should deploy the version ASAP. The only
technical questions I have are:
* Should we close/retarget single issue left for M2 in JIRA? [1]
* Is it fine to release with obsolete (2010) license year in CM
"About" dialog (I'll change that in trunk right now)
Thanks,
Andrey
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&jqlQuery=project+%3D+CAY+AND+resolution+%3D+Unresolved+AND+fixVersion+%3D+%223.1M2%22+ORDER+BY+priority+DESC&mode=hide
2011/3/1 Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>:
> Very cool.
>
> And we need just one more volunteer.
>
> (BTW, committers who are not PMC members are more than welcome to evaluate the release and vote on it as well. It won't be a binding vote, but it will still be very valuable.)
>
> Andrus
>
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
>
>> Hi Andrus,
>>
>> My intention is to check it out tonight from home since I can't seem
>> to build at work. I was going to do that last night, but was overcome
>> by events.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> mrg
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>>> Actually we need 3 PMC +1's to make it an Apache release. I don't think we can bypass that. So I have no problem if voting takes more time, but we do it properly.
>>>
>>> What about other PMC members - who else can take a look at it?
>>>
>>> Andrus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>>>
>>>> My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
>>>>
>>>> Ari
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Andrus
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> -------------------------->
>>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Very cool.
And we need just one more volunteer.
(BTW, committers who are not PMC members are more than welcome to evaluate the release and vote on it as well. It won't be a binding vote, but it will still be very valuable.)
Andrus
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Michael Gentry wrote:
> Hi Andrus,
>
> My intention is to check it out tonight from home since I can't seem
> to build at work. I was going to do that last night, but was overcome
> by events.
>
> Thanks,
>
> mrg
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>> Actually we need 3 PMC +1's to make it an Apache release. I don't think we can bypass that. So I have no problem if voting takes more time, but we do it properly.
>>
>> What about other PMC members - who else can take a look at it?
>>
>> Andrus
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>>
>>> My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
>>>
>>> Ari
>>>
>>>
>>> On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>>>
>>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Andrus
>>>
>>> --
>>> -------------------------->
>>> Aristedes Maniatis
>>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Michael Gentry <mg...@masslight.net>.
Hi Andrus,
My intention is to check it out tonight from home since I can't seem
to build at work. I was going to do that last night, but was overcome
by events.
Thanks,
mrg
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Actually we need 3 PMC +1's to make it an Apache release. I don't think we can bypass that. So I have no problem if voting takes more time, but we do it properly.
>
> What about other PMC members - who else can take a look at it?
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>> My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>> On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>>
>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andrus
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, my four-year project (is it five now)? finally went live
yesterday. I can't even find time to keep up with my emails right
now :)
On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
> Actually we need 3 PMC +1's to make it an Apache release. I don't think we can bypass that. So I have no problem if voting takes more time, but we do it properly.
>
> What about other PMC members - who else can take a look at it?
>
> Andrus
>
>
>
> On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
>> My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
>>
>> Ari
>>
>>
>> On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>>
>>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Andrus
>>
>> --
>> -------------------------->
>> Aristedes Maniatis
>> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Andrus Adamchik <an...@objectstyle.org>.
Actually we need 3 PMC +1's to make it an Apache release. I don't think we can bypass that. So I have no problem if voting takes more time, but we do it properly.
What about other PMC members - who else can take a look at it?
Andrus
On Mar 1, 2011, at 5:03 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
> My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
>
> Ari
>
>
> On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
>> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>>
>> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andrus
>
> --
> -------------------------->
> Aristedes Maniatis
> GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A
>
Re: [VOTE] Cayenne 3.1M2
Posted by Aristedes Maniatis <ar...@maniatis.org>.
My apologies... I've been swamped by work and a small IT disaster to solve this last fortnight. But in principal I think this is a very good time for M2 and even without more votes from committers who can test it, I say put it out there... this is only a milestone after all, not a beta or final release.
Ari
On 23/02/11 10:35 PM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> This got delayed a few days, as I was busy at work, but now finally I finished release preparation and posted it here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~aadamchik/release/3.1M2/
>
> Please evaluate and cast your votes.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrus
--
-------------------------->
Aristedes Maniatis
GPG fingerprint CBFB 84B4 738D 4E87 5E5C 5EFA EF6A 7D2E 3E49 102A