You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/08/22 17:13:52 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] azagrebin commented on a change in pull request #13181: [FLINK-18957] Implement logical request bulk tracking in SlotSharingExecutionSlotAllocator

azagrebin commented on a change in pull request #13181:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/13181#discussion_r475110865



##########
File path: flink-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/flink/runtime/jobmaster/slotpool/PhysicalSlotRequestBulkImpl.java
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+ * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
+ * distributed with this work for additional information
+ * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
+ * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
+ * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
+ * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+
+package org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.slotpool;
+
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.clusterframework.types.AllocationID;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.clusterframework.types.ResourceProfile;
+import org.apache.flink.runtime.jobmaster.SlotRequestId;
+
+import java.util.Collection;
+import java.util.HashMap;
+import java.util.HashSet;
+import java.util.Map;
+import java.util.Set;
+import java.util.function.BiConsumer;
+
+/**
+ * Represents a bulk of physical slot requests.
+ */
+class PhysicalSlotRequestBulkImpl implements PhysicalSlotRequestBulk {

Review comment:
       I agree, this is a good point. I do not have strong opinion when to do it. However, I would prefer to move `PhysicalSlotRequestBulkImpl` to tests during the removal of `OneSlotPerExecution` code as it is quite simple and we will not have duplications meanwhile. wdyt?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org