[jira] Commented: (OWB-490) ProcessObserverMethod Type parameters are inverted (CDITCK-174)

["David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12971346#action_12971346 ] 

David Jencks commented on OWB-490:
----------------------------------

There's a new 1.0.2.SP1 cdi tck available and these tests are failing for me:

  testGetAnnotatedMethod(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.extensions.observer.ProcessObserverMethodEventTest)
  testProcessObserverMethodEventsSent(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.extensions.observer.ProcessObserverMethodEventTest)
  testGetObserverMethod(org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.extensions.observer.ProcessObserverMethodEventTest)

Have not yet investigated why.

> ProcessObserverMethod Type parameters are inverted (CDITCK-174)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OWB-490
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-490
>             Project: OpenWebBeans
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Events
>    Affects Versions: 1.1.0
>            Reporter: David Jencks
>            Assignee: Gurkan Erdogdu
>             Fix For: 1.1.0
>
>
> cf CDITCK-174.  There's some code in NotificationManager that swaps the arguments if it's an observer.  I think this was because the tck was wrong.  Now that its fixed this swapping causes a tck failure.  The order is checked in the PortableAddObserverMethodTest and AddObserverMethodExtension which has the opposite order as the tck ProcessObserverMethodObserver.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.