You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Guy Ferraiolo <gu...@cnet.com> on 2008/03/22 00:54:38 UTC
flood random subst patch
Folks
Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me
know.
Guy
--
Guy Ferraiolo mailto:guyf@CNET.com
Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com
CNET tel: 1.908.541.3739
1200 Route 22 East fax: 1.908.575.7474
Bridgewater, NJ 08807 cel: 1.732.618.0250
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Guy Ferraiolo <gu...@cnet.com>.
Thanks!
Guy
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 14:27 +0200, Vincent van Scherpenseel wrote:
> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> > For those unaware, there are new "flood" and "framework" components
> > of the "httpd-test" bugzilla product.
>
> Excellent :) I'm glad flood is regaining attention. It's a great tool
> and I find it a pity that the project isn't that active anymore. The
> site could use a little updating too: I get 404s for every
> svn.apache.org/... link. Also, I believe there's no link back to the
> homepage from the child pages.
>
> Guy Ferraiolo: thank you very much for submitting your patch. It has
> really been a lifesaver for me. Keep up the good work.
>
> Cheers, Vincent
--
Guy Ferraiolo mailto:guyf@CNET.com
Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com
CNET tel: 1.908.541.3739
1200 Route 22 East fax: 1.908.575.7474
Bridgewater, NJ 08807 cel: 1.732.618.0250
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Vincent van Scherpenseel wrote:
>
> Excellent :) I'm glad flood is regaining attention. It's a great tool
> and I find it a pity that the project isn't that active anymore. The
> site could use a little updating too: I get 404s for every
> svn.apache.org/... link. Also, I believe there's no link back to the
> homepage from the child pages.
Give it an hour to refresh, these still might use work but I had a few
minutes just to fix the broken links.
Bill
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Vincent van Scherpenseel <ma...@syn-ack.org>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> For those unaware, there are new "flood" and "framework" components
> of the "httpd-test" bugzilla product.
Excellent :) I'm glad flood is regaining attention. It's a great tool
and I find it a pity that the project isn't that active anymore. The
site could use a little updating too: I get 404s for every
svn.apache.org/... link. Also, I believe there's no link back to the
homepage from the child pages.
Guy Ferraiolo: thank you very much for submitting your patch. It has
really been a lifesaver for me. Keep up the good work.
Cheers, Vincent
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
For those unaware, there are new "flood" and "framework" components
of the "httpd-test" bugzilla product.
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Sander Temme wrote:
>
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:32 PM, James M. Leddy wrote:
>
>>> A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood 'component', or
>>> an httpd 'project' with new subprojects.
>> Thank you for making this clear. My vote is for choice #2.
>
>
> I'd also tend towards a httpd-test Product with perl-framework and Flood
> Components. I'll give it a day or so for folks to weigh in, then create
> it.
Rereading - I'd agree that #2 is best.
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Plüm,
Rüdiger,
VF-Group <ru...@vodafone.com>.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Sander Temme
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. März 2008 06:48
> An: dev@httpd.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: flood random subst patch
>
>
> On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:32 PM, James M. Leddy wrote:
>
> >> A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood
> 'component',
> >> or
> >> an httpd 'project' with new subprojects.
> > Thank you for making this clear. My vote is for choice #2.
>
>
> I'd also tend towards a httpd-test Product with perl-framework and
> Flood Components. I'll give it a day or so for folks to weigh in,
> then create it.
+1 to this solution.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@apache.org>.
On Mar 25, 2008, at 9:32 PM, James M. Leddy wrote:
>> A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood 'component',
>> or
>> an httpd 'project' with new subprojects.
> Thank you for making this clear. My vote is for choice #2.
I'd also tend towards a httpd-test Product with perl-framework and
Flood Components. I'll give it a day or so for folks to weigh in,
then create it.
S.
--
Sander Temme
sctemme@apache.org
PGP FP: 51B4 8727 466A 0BC3 69F4 B7B8 B2BE BC40 1529 24AF
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "James M. Leddy" <jl...@redhat.com>.
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>>
>> Can someone with Bugzilla karma please add Flood as a component to
>> the Apache httpd-2 product?
>
> Please, no.
>
> A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood 'component', or
> an httpd 'project' with new subprojects.
Thank you for making this clear. My vote is for choice #2.
>
> But flood is unrelated to httpd-2, and isn't subject to the creation of
> httpd-3.
>
> Bill
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
>
> Can someone with Bugzilla karma please add Flood as a component to
> the Apache httpd-2 product?
Please, no.
A Flood 'project', a httpd-test 'project' with a flood 'component', or
an httpd 'project' with new subprojects.
But flood is unrelated to httpd-2, and isn't subject to the creation of
httpd-3.
Bill
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 03/25/2008 08:04 PM, James M. Leddy wrote:
> Guy Ferraiolo wrote:
>> Folks
>>
>> Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me
>> know.
>>
>> Guy
>>
>>
> Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past few
> weeks, but it crashes on my x86_64 system and there isn't a bugzilla in
> which to file a report. Is there anyone currently maintaining the project?
Can someone with Bugzilla karma please add Flood as a component to
the Apache httpd-2 product?
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Guy Ferraiolo <gu...@cnet.com>.
It runs fine on one of our x86_64 machines. I'd be glad to take
responsibility.
Guy
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:04 -0400, James M. Leddy wrote:
> Guy Ferraiolo wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me
> > know.
> >
> > Guy
> >
> >
> Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past few
> weeks, but it crashes on my x86_64 system and there isn't a bugzilla in
> which to file a report. Is there anyone currently maintaining the project?
>
--
Guy Ferraiolo mailto:guyf@CNET.com
Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com
CNET tel: 1.908.541.3739
1200 Route 22 East fax: 1.908.575.7474
Bridgewater, NJ 08807 cel: 1.732.618.0250
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by Guy Ferraiolo <gu...@cnet.com>.
It runs find on one of our x86_64 machines.
On Tue, 2008-03-25 at 15:04 -0400, James M. Leddy wrote:
> Guy Ferraiolo wrote:
> > Folks
> >
> > Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me
> > know.
> >
> > Guy
> >
> >
> Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past few
> weeks, but it crashes on my x86_64 system and there isn't a bugzilla in
> which to file a report. Is there anyone currently maintaining the project?
>
--
Guy Ferraiolo mailto:guyf@CNET.com
Performance Measurement & Analysis http://CNET.com
CNET tel: 1.908.541.3739
1200 Route 22 East fax: 1.908.575.7474
Bridgewater, NJ 08807 cel: 1.732.618.0250
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "James M. Leddy" <jl...@redhat.com>.
Guy Ferraiolo wrote:
> Folks
>
> Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me
> know.
>
> Guy
>
>
Flood looks to be a dead project. I've been using it for the past few
weeks, but it crashes on my x86_64 system and there isn't a bugzilla in
which to file a report. Is there anyone currently maintaining the project?
Re: flood random subst patch
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Guy Ferraiolo wrote:
> Folks
>
> Again, if there's anything I can do to help this along, please let me
> know.
Pointer to the now-current patch after all of the recent discussion would
help - I'm happy to commit this today.