[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2

[Christofer Dutz <ch...@c-ware.de>]

So, the vote passes with 3 +1 votes by PPMC members and one +1 vote by a non PPMC member.

I’ll forward this to the incubator for approval. Also I'll update the GIT tag as suggested.

Chris

Am 26.09.18, 08:10 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <ch...@c-ware.de>:

    Hi Julian,
    
    I agree, we should still ship it. I mean I know that there are issues. We couldn't have gotten everything right. And incubating releases don't have to be perfect.
    
    I would say we start releasing more regularly and simply fix the things we found and fixed in the next 0.2.0 release.
    
    We're not yet using real semver. I'll think we leave that to version 1.0.0.
    
    Chris
    
    
    
    Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen
    
    ________________________________
    From: Julian Feinauer <j....@pragmaticminds.de>
    Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2018 4:08:50 AM
    To: dev@plc4x.apache.org
    Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2
    
    Hi Andreas,
    
    thank you very much for your support (as I know to few about TIA programming to do it myself with our PLC here).
    I will try to dig into some of them the end of this or next week (if chris doesn’t do it first : )).
    
    I suggest to get the release going none the less (I think this is the usual way) and have a bugfix release soon (0.1.1) where such things are fixed.
    
    @chris: How is the procedure for hotfix releases (in semVer)? Always the same procedure?
    
    Julian
    
    Am 25.09.18, 14:12 schrieb "Uschold Andreas" <An...@tgw-group.com>:
    
        I just did some tests with the S7 driver and found a couple of issues.
    
        PLC4X-56 [S7] S7Field does not recognize addresses with numElements present
        PLC4X-57 [S7] Response for address with numElements contains only first item
        PLC4X-58 [S7] Reading more then PDU with one request blocks calling thread indefinitly
        PLC4X-59 [S7] Reading a UDINT with value 0x00000000 and non positive floating point values does not work
    
        I found these issues while testing exotic / exceptional constellations, so for "normal" use cases they are probably not an issue.
    
        Andreas
    
        -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
        Von: Julian Feinauer [mailto:j.feinauer@pragmaticminds.de]
        Gesendet: Montag, 24. September 2018 21:04
        An: dev@plc4x.apache.org
        Betreff: [EXT] Re: [VOTE] Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2
    
        +1 (contributor)
    
        Checks and build performed on Mac OS X.
    
        Checks performed:
        - Checked out using the new tooling: OK
        - Checked signatures: OK
        - Checked the zip correctly unpacks to the expected directory structure: OK
        - verify the existence of DISCLAIMER, LICENSE, NOTICE, README, RELEASE_NOTES: OK
        - Built from sources (including tests) according to instructions in README: OK
        - All tests pass: OK
    
        Julian
    
        Am 24.09.18, 16:39 schrieb "Stefan Bodewig" <bo...@apache.org>:
    
            On 2018-09-22, Christofer Dutz wrote:
    
            > Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.1.0 RC2 has been staged under [2] and it’s
            > time to vote on accepting it for release.  All Maven artifacts are
            > available under [1].  If approved we will seek final release approval
            > from the IPMC.  Voting will be open for 72hr.
    
            +1
    
            I've got some questions (see other-thread) but nothing that would
            invalidate the RC.
    
            Stefan