Re: Renumbering new releases

[Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>]

Sorry for delayed reply.  I like simply dropping the 0. from the front more
bc it is consistent and we are simply following an arbitrary directive to
move out of 0. land.

a 1.0 release in my mind should be some major milestone which I don't think
we really did.

Just my .02



On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:38 PM Dmitriy Lyubimov <dl...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am ok with 1.0
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:10 PM Andrew Musselman <
> andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We've been discussing moving to a 1.0 release for a few years now. This
> > past quarter we had a comment on our board report about whether we would
> > consider getting out of the 0.x releases.
> >
> > I think it makes sense especially since we've had major overhauls a
> > couple/few times now, which is one sign of a matured project.
> >
> > Instead of moving to 1.0, however, I would like to propose moving to 14.1
> > for our next release. This would recognize that for several years the
> > project has been ready to use, while keeping a similar historical release
> > ordering.
> >
> > Any thoughts on moving to that numbering scheme? Further releases could
> > increment the minor version and have hot fixes in point releases, or we
> > could just increment the major version for a yearly release, say.
> >
>

Re: Renumbering new releases

[Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>]

Awesome, thanks for the feedback. I don't think we need a vote but we can
leave it up to the buildmaster to decide :)

On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 6:27 AM Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sorry for delayed reply.  I like simply dropping the 0. from the front more
> bc it is consistent and we are simply following an arbitrary directive to
> move out of 0. land.
>
> a 1.0 release in my mind should be some major milestone which I don't think
> we really did.
>
> Just my .02
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 6:38 PM Dmitriy Lyubimov <dl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I am ok with 1.0
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:10 PM Andrew Musselman <
> > andrew.musselman@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > We've been discussing moving to a 1.0 release for a few years now. This
> > > past quarter we had a comment on our board report about whether we
> would
> > > consider getting out of the 0.x releases.
> > >
> > > I think it makes sense especially since we've had major overhauls a
> > > couple/few times now, which is one sign of a matured project.
> > >
> > > Instead of moving to 1.0, however, I would like to propose moving to
> 14.1
> > > for our next release. This would recognize that for several years the
> > > project has been ready to use, while keeping a similar historical
> release
> > > ordering.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on moving to that numbering scheme? Further releases could
> > > increment the minor version and have hot fixes in point releases, or we
> > > could just increment the major version for a yearly release, say.
> > >
> >
>