You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Byung-Hee HWANG <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr> on 2007/11/13 09:12:34 UTC
ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from
the my spamassassin rule is as follow:
whitelist_from_rcvd *@freebsd.org mx2.freebsd.org
and here is the recieved header with spamassassin:
Received: by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix, from userid 59)
id 66A1D3ECD; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:00:05 +0900 (KST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on
pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=15.1
tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
TVD_SPACE_RATIO autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
X-Spam-Comment: DKIM? See http://www.google.com/search?btnI&q=RFC+4871
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org
[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DE43ECB
for <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr>; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:00:04 +0900 (KST)
as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
i'm using 3.2.3 under freebsd.
--
"You can start by acting like a man." "LIKE A MAN!"
-- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 1", page 36
Re: [SOLVED]
Posted by Graham Murray <ne...@gmurray.org.uk>.
Byung-Hee HWANG <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr> writes:
> Well, for now, i don't think SA developers like IPv6. If IPv6 users
> increase more than now, then this bug will be fixed by SA developers.
> Just i will wait until then.
I do not think that the SA developers have any way of telling how many
of us IPv6 users there are.
Re: [SOLVED] (Was: Re: ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from)
Posted by Byung-Hee HWANG <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr>.
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 14:09 -0600, McDonald, Dan wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 04:46 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > The Rule in local.cf:
> > whitelist_from_rcvd *@freebsd.org mx2.freebsd.org
> >
> > The Result:
> > http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/stuff/IPv6-SpamAssassin-TESTING
> >
> > Patched by:
> > http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ipv6/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-ipv6-20070603.diff.gz
> >
> > respect,
>
> Is there a bug on http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ so that this
> will be fixed for everyone?
Well, for now, i don't think SA developers like IPv6. If IPv6 users
increase more than now, then this bug will be fixed by SA developers.
Just i will wait until then.
respect,
bh
--
"I made the peace, remember, I can't go back on my word."
-- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 28", page 399
Re: [SOLVED] (Was: Re: ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from)
Posted by "McDonald, Dan" <Da...@austinenergy.com>.
On Sun, 2007-11-18 at 04:46 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> The Rule in local.cf:
> whitelist_from_rcvd *@freebsd.org mx2.freebsd.org
>
> The Result:
> http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/stuff/IPv6-SpamAssassin-TESTING
>
> Patched by:
> http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ipv6/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-ipv6-20070603.diff.gz
>
> respect,
Is there a bug on http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/ so that this
will be fixed for everyone?
--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com
[SOLVED] (Was: Re: ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from)
Posted by Byung-Hee HWANG <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr>.
The Rule in local.cf:
whitelist_from_rcvd *@freebsd.org mx2.freebsd.org
The Result:
http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/stuff/IPv6-SpamAssassin-TESTING
Patched by:
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ipv6/Mail-SpamAssassin-3.2.0-ipv6-20070603.diff.gz
respect,
bh
--
"I am willing to sacrifice my commercial interests for the common good."
-- Vito Corleone, "Chapter 20", page 291
Re: ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from
Posted by Byung-Hee HWANG <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr>.
ah.. sorry.. the subject was wrong..
"ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from" ===> "ipv6 and whitelist_from_rcvd"
respect,
bh
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 17:27 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:22 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> > Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > > as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
> > > anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
> >
> > You can go back to using ipv4 or use another whitelist method such as
> > whitelist_from_spf/dkim/dk/auth. Although unless you've got an ipv4
> > relay somewhere to delimit your network boundary you may have issues
> > with those options as well. You may have to (if you must stick to ipv6
> > for your mail relay) rewrite the relay header (or insert another one) so
> > it looks like an ipv4 relay.
> >
> > Support for ipv6 in SA goes as far as that it will for the most part not
> > throw errors if it sees an ipv6 address where it wants an ipv4 address.
> >
> > There hasn't been any real work done on implementing ipv6 support since,
> > AFAIK, none of the SA developers have any real need for it at present.
> > It's something I've wanted to implement for a few years now but haven't
> > had both the time and tuits to do it at the same time.
>
> thanks for quick reply, and i solved with whitelist_from instead
> whitelist_from_rcvd under ipv6 ;;
>
> respect,
> bh
>
--
"But his ultimate aim is to enter that society with a certain power since
society doesn't really protect its members who do not have their own
individual power."
-- Michael Corleone, "Chapter 25", page 363
Re: ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from
Posted by Byung-Hee HWANG <bh...@izb.knu.ac.kr>.
hi,
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 03:22 -0500, Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> > as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
> > anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
>
> You can go back to using ipv4 or use another whitelist method such as
> whitelist_from_spf/dkim/dk/auth. Although unless you've got an ipv4
> relay somewhere to delimit your network boundary you may have issues
> with those options as well. You may have to (if you must stick to ipv6
> for your mail relay) rewrite the relay header (or insert another one) so
> it looks like an ipv4 relay.
>
> Support for ipv6 in SA goes as far as that it will for the most part not
> throw errors if it sees an ipv6 address where it wants an ipv4 address.
>
> There hasn't been any real work done on implementing ipv6 support since,
> AFAIK, none of the SA developers have any real need for it at present.
> It's something I've wanted to implement for a few years now but haven't
> had both the time and tuits to do it at the same time.
thanks for quick reply, and i solved with whitelist_from instead
whitelist_from_rcvd under ipv6 ;;
respect,
bh
--
"Never mind being a dance judge, do your job. Take a walk around the
neighborhood and see everything is OK."
-- Peter Clemenza, "Chapter 1", page 20
Re: ipv6 and whitelist_rcvd_from
Posted by "Daryl C. W. O'Shea" <sp...@dostech.ca>.
Byung-Hee HWANG wrote:
> as you can see above, there is no whitelist result. it does not work
> anymore, since i enabled ipv6. what can i do for solving this matter?
You can go back to using ipv4 or use another whitelist method such as
whitelist_from_spf/dkim/dk/auth. Although unless you've got an ipv4
relay somewhere to delimit your network boundary you may have issues
with those options as well. You may have to (if you must stick to ipv6
for your mail relay) rewrite the relay header (or insert another one) so
it looks like an ipv4 relay.
Support for ipv6 in SA goes as far as that it will for the most part not
throw errors if it sees an ipv6 address where it wants an ipv4 address.
There hasn't been any real work done on implementing ipv6 support since,
AFAIK, none of the SA developers have any real need for it at present.
It's something I've wanted to implement for a few years now but haven't
had both the time and tuits to do it at the same time.
Daryl