You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@aurora.apache.org by "Bill Farner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/08/28 20:49:45 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (AURORA-1457) Consider removing quota enforcement for dedicated jobs

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14720397#comment-14720397 ] 

Bill Farner commented on AURORA-1457:
-------------------------------------

Please also be sure to double-check the terminology used where this data is surfaced, since the meaning is changed.  For example, on the role page "Production Consumption" should be changed.  There are probably fields in objects deserving renames as well.

> Consider removing quota enforcement for dedicated jobs
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AURORA-1457
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AURORA-1457
>             Project: Aurora
>          Issue Type: Story
>          Components: Scheduler
>            Reporter: Maxim Khutornenko
>
> Jobs with a dedicated constraint set are effectively consuming resources from a sub pool of machines sharing a given attribute. This makes quota accounting and enforcement point moot as dedicated jobs don't share resources with other shared pool jobs.
> Consider ignoring quota enforcement for dedicated jobs to simplify cluster capacity/utilization analysis.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)