You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by "Ismael Juma (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/05/04 01:05:12 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (KAFKA-3651) Whenever the BufferPool throws a "Failed to allocate memory within the configured max blocking time" exception, it should also remove the condition object from the waiters deque

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Ismael Juma updated KAFKA-3651:
-------------------------------
    Summary: Whenever the BufferPool throws a "Failed to allocate memory within the configured max blocking time" exception, it should also remove the condition object from the waiters deque  (was: Whenever the BufferPool throws a "Failed to allocate memory within the configured max blocking time" excepion, it should also remove the condition object from the waiters deque)

> Whenever the BufferPool throws a "Failed to allocate memory within the configured max blocking time" exception, it should also remove the condition object from the waiters deque
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: KAFKA-3651
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3651
>             Project: Kafka
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Mayuresh Gharat
>            Assignee: Mayuresh Gharat
>
> "this.waiters.remove(moreMemory);" should happen before the exception
> is thrown.
> .Otherwise the waiting thread count will never get to 0 after the exception
> and batching will not occur. This is because in the RecordAccumulator.ready
> method the exhausted is set as
> boolean exhausted = this.free.queued() > 0 where free.queued() returns the
> waiters.size().



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)