You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jena.apache.org by Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> on 2014/06/19 09:16:55 UTC
Anonymous CMS Diff Bug?
Hi All
Over in the Jena PMC we've received a couple of anonymous CMS diffs lately
- which btw is a fantastic feature in our opinion - but we've noticed
something a little strange about the diffs
As seen in the diff forwarded below for some reason the users comments
about what changes have been made are included in the diff just below the
Title field. This is a little irritating because we have to make one
commit to take the patch and then manually edit the page to commit a
removal of these lines before we can actually publish the updated site.
So my question is whether this is simply cockpit error on the part of the
user submitting these patches or an actual bug in the CMS?
Thanks,
Rob
On 18/06/2014 11:58, "Greg Albiston" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>Clone URL (Committers only):
>https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.
>apache.org/documentation%2Finference%2Findex.mdtext
>
>Greg Albiston
>
>Index: trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext
>===================================================================
>--- trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext (revision 1603331)
>+++ trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext (working copy)
>@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> Title: Reasoners and rule engines: Jena inference support
>
>+All headings below "Rules syntax and structure" aren't displaying
>correctly.
>+Added two missing </p> tags at the end of section which could be causing
>the problem.
> <p>This section of the documentation describes the current support for
>inference
> available within Jena. It includes an outline of the general inference
>API,
> together with details of the specific rule engines and configurations
>for RDFS
>@@ -1339,7 +1341,7 @@
> <code>OWLMini</code> (case insensitive).
> </dd>
> </dl>
>-
>+</p>
> <p>
> So an example complete rule file which includes the RDFS rules and
>defines
> a single extra rule is:
>@@ -1348,7 +1350,7 @@
> @include <RDFS>.
>
> [rule1: (?f pre:father ?a) (?u pre:brother ?f) -> (?u pre:uncle
>?a)]
>-
>+</p>
> <p>[<a href="#rules">Rule index</a>] [<a href="#index">main
>index</a>]</p>
>
> ### <a name="RULEforward"></a>Forward chaining engine
>
Re: Anonymous CMS Diff Bug?
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
User error.
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:18 AM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
Hi All
Over in the Jena PMC we've received a couple of anonymous CMS diffs lately
- which btw is a fantastic feature in our opinion - but we've noticed
something a little strange about the diffs
As seen in the diff forwarded below for some reason the users comments
about what changes have been made are included in the diff just below the
Title field. This is a little irritating because we have to make one
commit to take the patch and then manually edit the page to commit a
removal of these lines before we can actually publish the updated site.
So my question is whether this is simply cockpit error on the part of the
user submitting these patches or an actual bug in the CMS?
Thanks,
Rob
On 18/06/2014 11:58, "Greg Albiston" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>Clone URL (Committers only):
>https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.
>apache.org/documentation%2Finference%2Findex.mdtext
>
>Greg Albiston
>
>Index: trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext
>===================================================================
>--- trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext (revision 1603331)
>+++ trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext (working copy)
>@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> Title: Reasoners and rule engines: Jena inference support
>
>+All headings below "Rules syntax and structure" aren't displaying
>correctly.
>+Added two missing </p> tags at the end of section which could be causing
>the problem.
> <p>This section of the documentation describes the current support for
>inference
> available within Jena. It includes an outline of the general inference
>API,
> together with details of the specific rule engines and configurations
>for RDFS
>@@ -1339,7 +1341,7 @@
> <code>OWLMini</code> (case insensitive).
> </dd>
> </dl>
>-
>+</p>
> <p>
> So an example complete rule file which includes the RDFS rules and
>defines
> a single extra rule is:
>@@ -1348,7 +1350,7 @@
> @include <RDFS>.
>
> [rule1: (?f pre:father ?a) (?u pre:brother ?f) -> (?u pre:uncle
>?a)]
>-
>+</p>
> <p>[<a href="#rules">Rule index</a>] [<a href="#index">main
>index</a>]</p>
>
> ### <a name="RULEforward"></a>Forward chaining engine
>
Re: Anonymous CMS Diff Bug?
Posted by Joe Schaefer <jo...@yahoo.com.INVALID>.
User error.
On Thursday, June 19, 2014 3:18 AM, Rob Vesse <rv...@dotnetrdf.org> wrote:
Hi All
Over in the Jena PMC we've received a couple of anonymous CMS diffs lately
- which btw is a fantastic feature in our opinion - but we've noticed
something a little strange about the diffs
As seen in the diff forwarded below for some reason the users comments
about what changes have been made are included in the diff just below the
Title field. This is a little irritating because we have to make one
commit to take the patch and then manually edit the page to commit a
removal of these lines before we can actually publish the updated site.
So my question is whether this is simply cockpit error on the part of the
user submitting these patches or an actual bug in the CMS?
Thanks,
Rob
On 18/06/2014 11:58, "Greg Albiston" <an...@apache.org> wrote:
>Clone URL (Committers only):
>https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.
>apache.org/documentation%2Finference%2Findex.mdtext
>
>Greg Albiston
>
>Index: trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext
>===================================================================
>--- trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext (revision 1603331)
>+++ trunk/content/documentation/inference/index.mdtext (working copy)
>@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> Title: Reasoners and rule engines: Jena inference support
>
>+All headings below "Rules syntax and structure" aren't displaying
>correctly.
>+Added two missing </p> tags at the end of section which could be causing
>the problem.
> <p>This section of the documentation describes the current support for
>inference
> available within Jena. It includes an outline of the general inference
>API,
> together with details of the specific rule engines and configurations
>for RDFS
>@@ -1339,7 +1341,7 @@
> <code>OWLMini</code> (case insensitive).
> </dd>
> </dl>
>-
>+</p>
> <p>
> So an example complete rule file which includes the RDFS rules and
>defines
> a single extra rule is:
>@@ -1348,7 +1350,7 @@
> @include <RDFS>.
>
> [rule1: (?f pre:father ?a) (?u pre:brother ?f) -> (?u pre:uncle
>?a)]
>-
>+</p>
> <p>[<a href="#rules">Rule index</a>] [<a href="#index">main
>index</a>]</p>
>
> ### <a name="RULEforward"></a>Forward chaining engine
>