You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@felix.apache.org by Elvy <pi...@gmail.com> on 2007/12/05 18:21:28 UTC
sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
hi all,
"org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved package in bundle 4:
package; (package=sun.java2d)"
As you can see, I'm having issues resolving the package sun.java2d.
I tried setting this on my config.properties file :
org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=sun.*,com.sun.*, but it doesn't get any
better.
I even tried to add sun and com.sun to org.osgi.framework.system.packages
but that fails too.
I assume Felix does concider the bootdelegation property.
Some please help me !! :-((
-----
Tell me something you don't know!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sun%2C-com.sun-and-org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation-tf4951006.html#a14175995
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 06/12/2007, Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 06.12.2007, 04:23 -0800 schrieb Elvy:
> > Why aren't sun and com.sun packages fully declared in the default
> > config.properties file? This would ensure presence in
> > org.osgi.framework.system.packages.
> >
> > Since those packages are part of the standard java rt.jar, one should
> expect
> > them to be treated just like, let's say, javax.
> >
> > Any particuliar reason...
>
> Yes, sun and com.sun packages are not part of the offical Java API and
> having them by defulat would open doors for non-portable solutions. For
> this reason, it is better to require explicitly setting these
> properties/packages.
Sun has an FAQ on this here:
http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/faq/faq-sun-packages.html
Regards
> Felix
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by Felix Meschberger <fm...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 06.12.2007, 04:23 -0800 schrieb Elvy:
> Why aren't sun and com.sun packages fully declared in the default
> config.properties file? This would ensure presence in
> org.osgi.framework.system.packages.
>
> Since those packages are part of the standard java rt.jar, one should expect
> them to be treated just like, let's say, javax.
>
> Any particuliar reason...
Yes, sun and com.sun packages are not part of the offical Java API and
having them by defulat would open doors for non-portable solutions. For
this reason, it is better to require explicitly setting these
properties/packages.
Regards
Felix
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
On 06/12/2007, Elvy <pi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Why aren't sun and com.sun packages fully declared in the default
> config.properties file? This would ensure presence in
> org.osgi.framework.system.packages.
>
> Since those packages are part of the standard java rt.jar,
actually these are implementation specific packages that might not appear in
non-Sun JVMs (they do not form part of the official spec, unlike java and
javax)
one should expect
> them to be treated just like, let's say, javax.
>
> Any particuliar reason...
>
> -----
> Tell me something you don't know!
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/sun%2C-com.sun-and-org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation-tf4951006.html#a14191282
> Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
>
--
Cheers, Stuart
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Elvy wrote:
> Why aren't sun and com.sun packages fully declared in the default
> config.properties file? This would ensure presence in
> org.osgi.framework.system.packages.
>
Where do you mean to declare them? There is no intended relationship
between boot delegation and system packages. Boot delegation is for
making class path packages available to bundles without requiring them
to have Import-Package declarations for those packages. System packages
is for making class path packages available to bundles while requiring
them to have Import-Package declarations for those packages.
We generally do not want to encourage people to use non-standard API, so
we don't expose these packages by default using either of these mechanisms.
-> richard
> Since those packages are part of the standard java rt.jar, one should expect
> them to be treated just like, let's say, javax.
>
> Any particuliar reason...
>
> -----
> Tell me something you don't know!
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by Elvy <pi...@gmail.com>.
Why aren't sun and com.sun packages fully declared in the default
config.properties file? This would ensure presence in
org.osgi.framework.system.packages.
Since those packages are part of the standard java rt.jar, one should expect
them to be treated just like, let's say, javax.
Any particuliar reason...
-----
Tell me something you don't know!
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/sun%2C-com.sun-and-org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation-tf4951006.html#a14191282
Sent from the Apache Felix - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Well, if you are getting an "unresolved package" exception, then
> putting it on the boot delegation property will not help, since this
> does not provide it as an export to resolve the bundle's import of
> that package. Boot delegation automatically gives bundles access to a
> class without having to import it at all.
That should say, "...automatically gives a bundle access to a class path
package without having to import it at all."
>
> However, adding it to the org.osgi.framework.system.packages property
> should work, but you cannot just add "sun" and "com.sun", you need to
> add the explicit package you need to export from the class path, e.g.,
> "sun.java2d" in your case.
>
> -> richard
>
> Elvy wrote:
>> hi all,
>>
>> "org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved package in bundle 4:
>> package; (package=sun.java2d)"
>>
>> As you can see, I'm having issues resolving the package sun.java2d.
>>
>> I tried setting this on my config.properties file :
>> org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=sun.*,com.sun.*, but it doesn't get
>> any
>> better.
>> I even tried to add sun and com.sun to
>> org.osgi.framework.system.packages
>> but that fails too.
>>
>> I assume Felix does concider the bootdelegation property.
>>
>> Some please help me !! :-((
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -----
>> Tell me something you don't know!
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org
Re: sun, com.sun and org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Well, if you are getting an "unresolved package" exception, then putting
it on the boot delegation property will not help, since this does not
provide it as an export to resolve the bundle's import of that package.
Boot delegation automatically gives bundles access to a class without
having to import it at all.
However, adding it to the org.osgi.framework.system.packages property
should work, but you cannot just add "sun" and "com.sun", you need to
add the explicit package you need to export from the class path, e.g.,
"sun.java2d" in your case.
-> richard
Elvy wrote:
> hi all,
>
> "org.osgi.framework.BundleException: Unresolved package in bundle 4:
> package; (package=sun.java2d)"
>
> As you can see, I'm having issues resolving the package sun.java2d.
>
> I tried setting this on my config.properties file :
> org.osgi.framework.bootdelegation=sun.*,com.sun.*, but it doesn't get any
> better.
>
> I even tried to add sun and com.sun to org.osgi.framework.system.packages
> but that fails too.
>
> I assume Felix does concider the bootdelegation property.
>
> Some please help me !! :-((
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Tell me something you don't know!
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@felix.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@felix.apache.org