You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by sameer <sa...@c2.net> on 1997/03/01 18:56:24 UTC

Re: ZD do it again!

> 
> Most of the tests are on Stronghold, so I'm not sure if they did contact
> them or not for performance tuning...
> 
	I remember a PC Magazine review for Stronghold. This was a
large number of months ago though, but they did have a seirous problem
with the ability to set the "Group". (The problem was that stronghold
defaulted to Gruop nobody but solaris only has 'nogroup' -- so sinc
ethen stronghold now checks for the existing of noboy or nogroup,
etc.) This was before we had a 300 page manual, before we had a cdrom,
a box, etc. They did contact us then, and I told them "make sure you
configure the maxspare/minspare" correctly. But they didn't ask me how
to do that. We haven't been contacted since that article though. There
is a new one, I take it from the posts here. I wonder if they are just
reusing their old stronghold test results, or if they are using the
old version of stornghold from back then.

-- 
Sameer Parekh					Voice:   510-986-8770
President					FAX:     510-986-8777
C2Net
http://www.c2.net/				sameer@c2.net