You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Sean Owen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/08/25 09:04:20 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (SPARK-14377) Review spark.ml parity for classification, except trees

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14377?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Sean Owen resolved SPARK-14377.
-------------------------------
    Resolution: Done

I think this is Done given that there's a review output below including JIRAs.

> Review spark.ml parity for classification, except trees
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-14377
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14377
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: ML
>            Reporter: Joseph K. Bradley
>            Assignee: Joseph K. Bradley
>
> Review parity of spark.ml vs. spark.mllib to ensure spark.ml contains all functionality.  List all missing items.
> This only covers Scala since we can compare Scala vs. Python in spark.ml itself.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org