You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "stack (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/31 08:41:38 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-10577) Remove unnecessary looping in
FSHLog
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10577?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
stack resolved HBASE-10577.
---------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
(You are right [~busbey])
> Remove unnecessary looping in FSHLog
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-10577
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10577
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wal
> Affects Versions: 0.99.0
> Reporter: Himanshu Vashishtha
>
> In the new disruptor based FSHLog, the Syncer threads are handed a batch of SyncFuture objects from the RingBufferHandler. The Syncer then invokes a sync call on the current writer instance.
> This handing of batch is done in serially in RingBufferHandler, that is, every syncer receives a non overlapping batch of SyncFutures. Once synced, Syncer thread updates highestSyncedSequence.
> In the run method of Syncer, we have:
> {code}
> long currentHighestSyncedSequence = highestSyncedSequence.get();
> if (currentSequence < currentHighestSyncedSequence) {
> syncCount += releaseSyncFuture(takeSyncFuture, currentHighestSyncedSequence, null);
> // Done with the 'take'. Go around again and do a new 'take'.
> continue;
> }
> {code}
> I find this logic of polling the BlockingQueue again in this condition un-necessary. When the currentHighestSyncedSequence is already greater than currentSequence, then doesn't it mean some other Syncer has already synced SyncFuture of these ops ? And, we should just go ahead and release all the SyncFutures for this batch to unblock the handlers. That would avoid polling the Blockingqueue for all SyncFuture objects in this case.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)