You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@arrow.apache.org by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com> on 2017/09/25 14:14:20 UTC
Minor release (0.7.1) for Arrow this week
hi folks,
We just fixed a bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1601)
causing some crashes for users. There is another bug fix ARROW-1606
impacting thirdparty builds / packaging. Based on these, I would like
to cut a release candidate for a 0.7.1 minor release later today and
start a vote.
There have been a couple of minor new features merged since 0.7.0, but
the rest of the patches have been bug fixes. If there are no
objections, I will base the RC on master rather than preparing a
backports branch.
Thanks
Wes
Re: Minor release for Parquet C++ (1.3.1) based the Arrow bugfix (0.7.1) this week
Posted by "Uwe L. Korn" <uw...@xhochy.com>.
Also we seem to have a bug that we cannot write DictionaryArrays of NullType in the write path. They occur when you convert a Pandas Series of all-None to categorical and then try to write them to Parquet. I can take care of that on Thursday.
Uwe
> Am 03.10.2017 um 17:17 schrieb Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>:
>
> I would like to see PARQUET-1095 resolved
> (https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/403), and then we can cut
> cpp 1.3.1.
>
>> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> a small heads-up that we will also make a bugfix release for parquet-cpp
>> this week once the Arrow release is out.
>>
>> Uwe
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017, at 04:14 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>>> hi folks,
>>>
>>> We just fixed a bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1601)
>>> causing some crashes for users. There is another bug fix ARROW-1606
>>> impacting thirdparty builds / packaging. Based on these, I would like
>>> to cut a release candidate for a 0.7.1 minor release later today and
>>> start a vote.
>>>
>>> There have been a couple of minor new features merged since 0.7.0, but
>>> the rest of the patches have been bug fixes. If there are no
>>> objections, I will base the RC on master rather than preparing a
>>> backports branch.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Wes
Re: Minor release for Parquet C++ (1.3.1) based the Arrow bugfix
(0.7.1) this week
Posted by Wes McKinney <we...@gmail.com>.
I would like to see PARQUET-1095 resolved
(https://github.com/apache/parquet-cpp/pull/403), and then we can cut
cpp 1.3.1.
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 9:29 AM, Uwe L. Korn <uw...@xhochy.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> a small heads-up that we will also make a bugfix release for parquet-cpp
> this week once the Arrow release is out.
>
> Uwe
>
> On Mon, Sep 25, 2017, at 04:14 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>> hi folks,
>>
>> We just fixed a bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1601)
>> causing some crashes for users. There is another bug fix ARROW-1606
>> impacting thirdparty builds / packaging. Based on these, I would like
>> to cut a release candidate for a 0.7.1 minor release later today and
>> start a vote.
>>
>> There have been a couple of minor new features merged since 0.7.0, but
>> the rest of the patches have been bug fixes. If there are no
>> objections, I will base the RC on master rather than preparing a
>> backports branch.
>>
>> Thanks
>> Wes
Re: Minor release for Parquet C++ (1.3.1) based the Arrow bugfix (0.7.1)
this week
Posted by "Uwe L. Korn" <uw...@xhochy.com>.
Hello,
a small heads-up that we will also make a bugfix release for parquet-cpp
this week once the Arrow release is out.
Uwe
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017, at 04:14 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> We just fixed a bug (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1601)
> causing some crashes for users. There is another bug fix ARROW-1606
> impacting thirdparty builds / packaging. Based on these, I would like
> to cut a release candidate for a 0.7.1 minor release later today and
> start a vote.
>
> There have been a couple of minor new features merged since 0.7.0, but
> the rest of the patches have been bug fixes. If there are no
> objections, I will base the RC on master rather than preparing a
> backports branch.
>
> Thanks
> Wes