You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by He...@sun.com on 2007/05/18 17:55:08 UTC

Regression Test Report - Daily 538986 - Sun DBTG

[Auto-generated mail]

*Daily* 538986/2007-05-17 18:00:10 CEST

Failed  Tests    OK  Skip  Duration       Suite
-------------------------------------------------------
*Jvm: 1.6*
 lin
    0    313    313     0    74.47%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   710.53%     suitesAll
 sles
    0    313    313     0    75.21%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   417.88%     suitesAll
 sol
    0    313    313     0    78.55%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   734.61%     suitesAll
 solN+1
    0    313    313     0    86.53%     derbyall
   NA     NA     NA    NA               suitesAll
 sparc
    0    313    313     0    69.36%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   480.52%     suitesAll
 vista
    0    313    313     0   .%     derbyall
    F:70,E:30    8148    8048     0   425.71%     suitesAll
 w2003
    0    313    313     0   .%     derbyall
    F:70,E:30    8148    8048     0   225.65%     suitesAll
  Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/testSummary-538986.html 
  Attempted failure analysis in
                  http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.6/FailReports/538986.html 

*Jvm: 1.5*
 lin
    0    306    306     2    73.85%     derbyall
    F:70,E:31    6503    6402     0   524.71%     suitesAll
 sles
    0    306    306     2    72.29%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6503    6404     0   336.26%     suitesAll
 sol
    0    306    306     2    81.67%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6503    6404     0   440.76%     suitesAll
 solN+1
   NA     NA     NA    NA               derbyall
   NA     NA     NA    NA               suitesAll
 sparc
    0    306    306     2    69.55%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6503    6404     0   389.14%     suitesAll
 vista
    0    306    306     2    74.11%     derbyall
    F:70,E:30    6503    6403     0   270.08%     suitesAll
 w2003
    0    306    306     2    76.82%     derbyall
    F:70,E:30    6503    6403     0   179.25%     suitesAll
  Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/testing/Limited/testSummary-538986.html 
  Attempted failure analysis in
                  http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/FailReports/538986.html 

*Jvm: 1.4*
 lin
    0    303    303     4    74.62%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   471.63%     suitesAll
 sles
    0    303    303     4    72.27%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   310.38%     suitesAll
 sol
    0    303    303     4    80.56%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   362.22%     suitesAll
 solN+1
   NA     NA     NA    NA               derbyall
   NA     NA     NA    NA               suitesAll
 sparc
    0    303    303     4    69.87%     derbyall
    F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   400.82%     suitesAll
 vista
    1    303    302     4   .%     derbyall
    F:70,E:30    6499    6399     0   266.81%     suitesAll
 w2003
    0    303    303     4   .%     derbyall
    F:71,E:30    6499    6398     0   .%     suitesAll
  Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.4/testing/Limited/testSummary-538986.html 
  Attempted failure analysis in
                  http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.4/FailReports/538986.html 

-------------------------------------------------------

Changes in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/UpdateInfo/538986.txt 

( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ ) 


Re: Regression Test Report - Daily 538986 - Sun DBTG

Posted by Mike Matrigali <mi...@sbcglobal.net>.
Kathey is trying to figure out DERBY-2644, but I believe many of
the errors in the tinderbox and sun jvm nightly are not this error.
The change for DERBY-1746 affected environment setup to run the
upgrade tests, maybe this broke the environment on the tinderbox
and regression test machine.  I am a little surprised as I thought
the effect would be either not find the jar's and then not run
upgrade, or find them in a different place and then successfully
run the upgrade tests.

Henri.Vandescheur@sun.com wrote:
> [Auto-generated mail]
> 
> *Daily* 538986/2007-05-17 18:00:10 CEST
> 
> Failed  Tests    OK  Skip  Duration       Suite
> -------------------------------------------------------
> *Jvm: 1.6*
>  lin
>     0    313    313     0    74.47%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   710.53%     suitesAll
>  sles
>     0    313    313     0    75.21%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   417.88%     suitesAll
>  sol
>     0    313    313     0    78.55%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   734.61%     suitesAll
>  solN+1
>     0    313    313     0    86.53%     derbyall
>    NA     NA     NA    NA               suitesAll
>  sparc
>     0    313    313     0    69.36%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    8148    8049     0   480.52%     suitesAll
>  vista
>     0    313    313     0   .%     derbyall
>     F:70,E:30    8148    8048     0   425.71%     suitesAll
>  w2003
>     0    313    313     0   .%     derbyall
>     F:70,E:30    8148    8048     0   225.65%     suitesAll
>   Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.6/testing/Limited/testSummary-538986.html 
>   Attempted failure analysis in
>                   http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.6/FailReports/538986.html 
> 
> *Jvm: 1.5*
>  lin
>     0    306    306     2    73.85%     derbyall
>     F:70,E:31    6503    6402     0   524.71%     suitesAll
>  sles
>     0    306    306     2    72.29%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6503    6404     0   336.26%     suitesAll
>  sol
>     0    306    306     2    81.67%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6503    6404     0   440.76%     suitesAll
>  solN+1
>    NA     NA     NA    NA               derbyall
>    NA     NA     NA    NA               suitesAll
>  sparc
>     0    306    306     2    69.55%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6503    6404     0   389.14%     suitesAll
>  vista
>     0    306    306     2    74.11%     derbyall
>     F:70,E:30    6503    6403     0   270.08%     suitesAll
>  w2003
>     0    306    306     2    76.82%     derbyall
>     F:70,E:30    6503    6403     0   179.25%     suitesAll
>   Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/testing/Limited/testSummary-538986.html 
>   Attempted failure analysis in
>                   http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.5/FailReports/538986.html 
> 
> *Jvm: 1.4*
>  lin
>     0    303    303     4    74.62%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   471.63%     suitesAll
>  sles
>     0    303    303     4    72.27%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   310.38%     suitesAll
>  sol
>     0    303    303     4    80.56%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   362.22%     suitesAll
>  solN+1
>    NA     NA     NA    NA               derbyall
>    NA     NA     NA    NA               suitesAll
>  sparc
>     0    303    303     4    69.87%     derbyall
>     F:69,E:30    6499    6400     0   400.82%     suitesAll
>  vista
>     1    303    302     4   .%     derbyall
>     F:70,E:30    6499    6399     0   266.81%     suitesAll
>  w2003
>     0    303    303     4   .%     derbyall
>     F:71,E:30    6499    6398     0   .%     suitesAll
>   Details in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.4/testing/Limited/testSummary-538986.html 
>   Attempted failure analysis in
>                   http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/jvm1.4/FailReports/538986.html 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Changes in      http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/Daily/UpdateInfo/538986.txt 
> 
> ( All results in http://dbtg.thresher.com/derby/test/ ) 
> 
> 
>