You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@subversion.apache.org by hw...@apache.org on 2011/10/17 16:30:46 UTC

svn commit: r1185206 - /subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Author: hwright
Date: Mon Oct 17 14:30:45 2011
New Revision: 1185206

URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1185206&view=rev
Log:
* STATUS: Vote.

Modified:
    subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS

Modified: subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS?rev=1185206&r1=1185205&r2=1185206&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS (original)
+++ subversion/branches/1.7.x/STATUS Mon Oct 17 14:30:45 2011
@@ -110,15 +110,6 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: stsp
 
- * r1182904, r1182909
-   Print an error message if a working copy upgrade fails due to bad MD5
-   base checksums, rather than asserting.
-   Justification:
-     Should reduce amount of spurious TortoiseSVN assertion reports on users@.
-     Invalid on-disk data does not merit an assertion.
-   Votes:
-     +1: stsp, danielsh
-
  * r1183054, r1183347
    Fix some backward compat in the JavaHL tigris wrappers.
    Justification:
@@ -143,18 +134,27 @@ Candidate changes:
    Votes:
      +1: stsp, julianfoad
 
+Veto-blocked changes:
+=====================
+
+Approved changes:
+=================
+
+ * r1182904, r1182909
+   Print an error message if a working copy upgrade fails due to bad MD5
+   base checksums, rather than asserting.
+   Justification:
+     Should reduce amount of spurious TortoiseSVN assertion reports on users@.
+     Invalid on-disk data does not merit an assertion.
+   Votes:
+     +1: stsp, danielsh, hwright
+
  * r1148652, r1148662, r1148699
-   Update serf revision numbers in STATUS.
+   Update serf revision numbers in INSTALL.
    Justification:
      We don't support serf 0.3 any more.
    Notes:
      When merging, exchange serf<->neon in the paragraph that starts
      "If you link against both,".
    Votes:
-     +1: danielsh, blair
-
-Veto-blocked changes:
-=====================
-
-Approved changes:
-=================
+     +1: danielsh, blair, hwright