You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Alex Parvulescu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/05/16 14:00:10 UTC

[jira] [Created] (OAK-6225) Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl

Alex Parvulescu created OAK-6225:
------------------------------------

             Summary: Analyse changing the persistence format pf GroupImpl
                 Key: OAK-6225
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-6225
             Project: Jackrabbit Oak
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: core
            Reporter: Alex Parvulescu


As suggested on OAK-3933, I'd like to look into using a different persistence format for the GroupImpl members.

Currently this is saved as a list of child nodes, and I'd like to bench this against a tree based approach where each sub child node represents a part of the key so it can be used for lookup.

WIP branch can be found at [0], I merged all the commits so far into a single one to reduce the noise.

fyi [~anchela]

[0] https://github.com/stillalex/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-3933



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)