You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by GOMEZ Henri <hg...@slib.fr> on 2001/05/11 09:54:07 UTC

[PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming

I'd like to rename the mod_jk and jk_ stuff to 
mod_jtc (jtc_) to let users have at the same 
time the actual mod_jk and the in dev mod_jtc.

Are you agree ?

-
Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)                     
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming

Posted by kevin seguin <se...@motive.com>.

actually, i think i might prefer something like mod_ajp and ajp_.  if
jtc means jakarta-tomcat-connector, that might be a little too generic. 
what do you call the next connector protocal?

kevin seguin wrote:
> 
> +1.
> 
> GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to rename the mod_jk and jk_ stuff to
> > mod_jtc (jtc_) to let users have at the same
> > time the actual mod_jk and the in dev mod_jtc.
> >
> > Are you agree ?
> >
> > -
> > Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
> > EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)
> > PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> > PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6

Re: [PROPOSAL] jakarta-tomcat-connectors renaming

Posted by kevin seguin <se...@motive.com>.

+1.

GOMEZ Henri wrote:
> 
> I'd like to rename the mod_jk and jk_ stuff to
> mod_jtc (jtc_) to let users have at the same
> time the actual mod_jk and the in dev mod_jtc.
> 
> Are you agree ?
> 
> -
> Henri Gomez                 ___[_]____
> EMAIL : hgomez@slib.fr        (. .)
> PGP KEY : 697ECEDD    ...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
> PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6