You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Mario Brandt <jb...@gmail.com> on 2011/09/26 13:29:11 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1100294 [1/17] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x: ./
modules/aaa/ modules/arch/win32/ modules/cache/ modules/database/
modules/dav/fs/ modules/dav/lock/ modules/dav/main/ modules/debug/
modules/echo/ modules/experimental/ modules/filt
Hi Bill,
is there still a plan to tag apr-iconv 1.2.2 cause of the mak & dep files?
Mario
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1100294&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Going forwards, keep win32 build in svn once a tree is stable.
>> Visual Studio 2010 users cannot convert our .dsp files, and
>> ddk toolchain users couldn't either.
> Note we are almost there; the 1.2.1 apr-iconv tag does not have .mak/.dep files
> yet, although they exist on trunk. I am thinking about tagging 1.2.2 sometime
> in the coming weeks to pick up build changes, if anyone had any other bug fixes
> they wanted to see on that historical artifact.
>
> I still expect we drop the apr-iconv code base with the release of apr 2.0.
>
Re: svn commit: r1100294 [1/17] - in /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x:
./ modules/aaa/ modules/arch/win32/ modules/cache/ modules/database/ modules/dav/fs/
modules/dav/lock/ modules/dav/main/ modules/debug/ modules/echo/ modules/experimental/
modules/filt
Posted by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
On 9/26/2011 6:29 AM, Mario Brandt wrote:
> Hi Bill,
> is there still a plan to tag apr-iconv 1.2.2 cause of the mak & dep files?
I'd be fine with doing that if I thought it could get 3 +1's. But it
makes sense to first incorporate whatever bug fix errata has ended up
in bugzilla.