You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Prasanna Santhanam <ts...@apache.org> on 2013/07/05 14:57:46 UTC
AWS SDK version for object store
There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears
I can't use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception
when this is done [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also
couple of other issues fixed related to s3 on the latest version of
the SDK. Is there any reason not to use the latest stable SDK version
in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the v1.3.21?
[1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
--
Prasanna.,
------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com
Re: AWS SDK version for object store
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 5:26 AM, Donal Lafferty
<do...@citrix.com> wrote:
> +1
+1 from me as well.
>
> IMHO, trade off is between getting fixes, especially security fixes, and possibility that AWS introduce a tweak that breaks our use case.
>
> The subtlety is that you'd use the latest version before integration testing rather than before release. I.e. get as many fixes as possible, but also make sure we don't ship something broken.
>
> Am I splitting hairs? (http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/split+hairs)
>
> DL
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org]
>> Sent: 06 July 2013 2:44 PM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: AWS SDK version for object store
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 06:27:46PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
>> > There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears
>> > I can't use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception
>> > when this is done [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also
>> > couple of other issues fixed related to s3 on the latest version of
>> > the SDK. Is there any reason not to use the latest stable SDK version
>> > in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the v1.3.21?
>> >
>> > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
>> >
>> Fixed by bumping up the version to 1.3.22. But would still like to bump it up
>> to the latest stable version of the SDK available at the time of the release ACS
>> 4.2
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Prasanna.,
>>
>> ------------------------
>> Powered by BigRock.com
>
>
RE: AWS SDK version for object store
Posted by Donal Lafferty <do...@citrix.com>.
+1
IMHO, trade off is between getting fixes, especially security fixes, and possibility that AWS introduce a tweak that breaks our use case.
The subtlety is that you'd use the latest version before integration testing rather than before release. I.e. get as many fixes as possible, but also make sure we don't ship something broken.
Am I splitting hairs? (http://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/split+hairs)
DL
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org]
> Sent: 06 July 2013 2:44 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: AWS SDK version for object store
>
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 06:27:46PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> > There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears
> > I can't use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception
> > when this is done [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also
> > couple of other issues fixed related to s3 on the latest version of
> > the SDK. Is there any reason not to use the latest stable SDK version
> > in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the v1.3.21?
> >
> > [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
> >
> Fixed by bumping up the version to 1.3.22. But would still like to bump it up
> to the latest stable version of the SDK available at the time of the release ACS
> 4.2
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> --
> Prasanna.,
>
> ------------------------
> Powered by BigRock.com
Re: AWS SDK version for object store
Posted by Prasanna Santhanam <ts...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 06:27:46PM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears
> I can't use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception
> when this is done [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also
> couple of other issues fixed related to s3 on the latest version of
> the SDK. Is there any reason not to use the latest stable SDK version
> in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the v1.3.21?
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
>
Fixed by bumping up the version to 1.3.22. But would still like to
bump it up to the latest stable version of the SDK available at the
time of the release ACS 4.2
Thoughts?
--
Prasanna.,
------------------------
Powered by BigRock.com
Re: AWS SDK version for object store
Posted by Thomas O'Dowd <tp...@cloudian.com>.
I'm +1 also to taking the latest stable release.
Tom.
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 13:28 -0400, John Burwell wrote:
> Edison,
>
> I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any "refinements" that Amazon introduces as part of their continuous improvement/deployment model.
>
> Thanks,
> -John
>
> On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> > From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to adapt to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to upgrade to latest SDK?
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org]
> >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM
> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> Subject: AWS SDK version for object store
> >>
> >> There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears I can't
> >> use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception when this is done
> >> [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also couple of other issues fixed
> >> related to s3 on the latest version of the SDK. Is there any reason not to use
> >> the latest stable SDK version in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the
> >> v1.3.21?
> >>
> >> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
> >>
> >> --
> >> Prasanna.,
> >>
> >> ------------------------
> >> Powered by BigRock.com
> >
>
--
Cloudian KK - http://www.cloudian.com/get-started.html
Fancy 100TB of full featured S3 Storage?
Checkout the Cloudian® Community Edition!
Re: AWS SDK version for object store
Posted by John Burwell <jb...@basho.com>.
Edison,
I vote to take the latest stable from Amazon. In addition to keeping up with security and bug fixes, it also ensures that we stay in sync with any "refinements" that Amazon introduces as part of their continuous improvement/deployment model.
Thanks,
-John
On Jul 8, 2013, at 1:26 PM, Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com> wrote:
> From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to adapt to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to upgrade to latest SDK?
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org]
>> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: AWS SDK version for object store
>>
>> There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears I can't
>> use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception when this is done
>> [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also couple of other issues fixed
>> related to s3 on the latest version of the SDK. Is there any reason not to use
>> the latest stable SDK version in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the
>> v1.3.21?
>>
>> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
>>
>> --
>> Prasanna.,
>>
>> ------------------------
>> Powered by BigRock.com
>
RE: AWS SDK version for object store
Posted by Edison Su <Ed...@citrix.com>.
>From CloudStack point of view, there should be minor changes in order to adapt to latest AWS SDK. What's your guys option, John, Thomas? Is it ok to upgrade to latest SDK?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Prasanna Santhanam [mailto:tsp@apache.org]
> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 5:58 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: AWS SDK version for object store
>
> There was another issue I found today with the SDK v1.3.21. It appears I can't
> use periods in the name of a bucket. I see an SSL Exception when this is done
> [1]. The bug is fixed in the v1.3.22. There are also couple of other issues fixed
> related to s3 on the latest version of the SDK. Is there any reason not to use
> the latest stable SDK version in CloudStack? IOW, why did we choose the
> v1.3.21?
>
> [1] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3374
>
> --
> Prasanna.,
>
> ------------------------
> Powered by BigRock.com