You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by nsanglar <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/03/29 06:02:54 UTC

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand...

GitHub user nsanglar opened a pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594

    NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand processor

    Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
    
    In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
    to ensure the following steps have been taken:
    
    ### For all changes:
    - [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
         in the commit message?
    
    - [x] Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
    
    - [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?
    
    - [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
    
    ### For code changes:
    - [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
    - [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
    - [x] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
    - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
    
    ### For documentation related changes:
    - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
    
    ### Note:
    Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.


You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:

    $ git pull https://github.com/Sqooba/nifi nifi-5024

Alternatively you can review and apply these changes as the patch at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594.patch

To close this pull request, make a commit to your master/trunk branch
with (at least) the following in the commit message:

    This closes #2594
    
----
commit cd7bc120e3d82a0aa392b84717e54e2f76ae7ae2
Author: Nicolas Sanglard <ni...@...>
Date:   2018-03-29T05:59:03Z

    NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand processor

----


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand proces...

Posted by nsanglar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user nsanglar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594
  
    @MikeThomsen It's strange because I removed this 1mb.txt file and the corresponding exclusion  in the previous commits. Did you added something before merging? I can see that the build is failing on master now


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand proces...

Posted by nsanglar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user nsanglar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594
  
    @MikeThomsen The AppVeyor build failed because:
    ```Build execution time has reached the maximum allowed time for your plan (90 minutes).```
    Is it a common issue?


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand proces...

Posted by MikeThomsen <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594
  
    Don't worry about it, it's just a checkstyle issue. I can fix with a simple commit.


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand...

Posted by nsanglar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user nsanglar commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594#discussion_r187841438
  
    --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExecuteStreamCommand.java ---
    @@ -351,6 +350,16 @@ public void onTrigger(ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session) thro
             builder.directory(dir);
             builder.redirectInput(Redirect.PIPE);
             builder.redirectOutput(Redirect.PIPE);
    +        final File errorOut;
    +        try {
    +            errorOut = File.createTempFile("out", null);
    +            errorOut.deleteOnExit();
    --- End diff --
    
    Good point, I will do that


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand...

Posted by nsanglar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user nsanglar commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594#discussion_r187841413
  
    --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExecuteStreamCommand.java ---
    @@ -382,10 +389,10 @@ public void onTrigger(ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session) thro
                 Map<String, String> attributes = new HashMap<>();
     
                 final StringBuilder strBldr = new StringBuilder();
    -            try {
    -                String line;
    -                while ((line = bufferedReader.readLine()) != null) {
    -                    strBldr.append(line).append("\n");
    +            try (final InputStream is = new FileInputStream(errorOut)) {
    --- End diff --
    
    Strange, the link is not working for me either anymore. There are some pointers on this stackoverflow thread: 
    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/16983372/why-does-process-hang-if-the-parent-does-not-consume-stdout-stderr-in-java
    The difference is that by writing to a file, you bypass the OS pipe for stderr, and therefore it does not block.
    By the way if you execute `TestExecuteStreamCommand` with the old code, you will be able to reproduce the deadlock even with unit tests.


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand proces...

Posted by MikeThomsen <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594
  
    Also, that exclude you removed is why it broke, but I forgot to do contrib-check apparently...


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand proces...

Posted by MikeThomsen <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user MikeThomsen commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594
  
    @nsanglar I think I must have missed your notifications. Sorry about that. WRT appveyor, don't worry about that since Travis passed at least one build (sometimes it gets cranky; 1 full pass is enough to pass that). I'll try to find some time to go over it tonight or tomorrow morning.


---

[GitHub] nifi issue #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand proces...

Posted by nsanglar <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user nsanglar commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594
  
    @MikeThomsen Did you have a chance to go through the changes?


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand...

Posted by asfgit <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand...

Posted by MikeThomsen <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594#discussion_r187743134
  
    --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExecuteStreamCommand.java ---
    @@ -382,10 +389,10 @@ public void onTrigger(ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session) thro
                 Map<String, String> attributes = new HashMap<>();
     
                 final StringBuilder strBldr = new StringBuilder();
    -            try {
    -                String line;
    -                while ((line = bufferedReader.readLine()) != null) {
    -                    strBldr.append(line).append("\n");
    +            try (final InputStream is = new FileInputStream(errorOut)) {
    --- End diff --
    
    The java-monitor.com link wouldn't load for me, so I couldn't see your reference. So is this problem here with the BufferedReader? I'm not entirely sure I follow the change here because either way you're pulling data from stderr. This case just redirects it and you're reading it from a file.


---

[GitHub] nifi pull request #2594: NIFI-5024 Resolves deadlock in ExecuteStreamCommand...

Posted by MikeThomsen <gi...@git.apache.org>.
Github user MikeThomsen commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2594#discussion_r187742376
  
    --- Diff: nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-standard-bundle/nifi-standard-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/standard/ExecuteStreamCommand.java ---
    @@ -351,6 +350,16 @@ public void onTrigger(ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session) thro
             builder.directory(dir);
             builder.redirectInput(Redirect.PIPE);
             builder.redirectOutput(Redirect.PIPE);
    +        final File errorOut;
    +        try {
    +            errorOut = File.createTempFile("out", null);
    +            errorOut.deleteOnExit();
    --- End diff --
    
    I would like to see this deleted after every iteration of the processor because it could a very long time brefore deleteOnExit gets executed.


---