1.6.12 tomorrow [was Re: 1.6.12 this week?]

["Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>]

I know people are still stumbling back into town from Berlin, but does
rolling 1.6.12 tomorrow sound reasonable?  If so, I'll encourage folks
to continue review, and I'll fire up my rolling environment.

Cheers,
-Hyrum

On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 6:13 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> We've managed to review and merge several items in STATUS, but if folks
> would take another look at stuff in the next few days, that'd be great
> (we'll roll 1.6.12 on Wednesday, probably).
>
> -Hyrum
>
> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>
>> That sounds reasonable.  We can test, review, vote, and merge stuff here
>> in Berlin, and then I'll roll the release next week.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> -Hyrum
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I do not think it makes sense to do the actual release, but it
>>> certainly makes sense for you all to go through STATUS together.  I'd
>>> then suggest setting a release date sometime after you are all back
>>> home.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 12:46 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
>>> <hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>> > Hey all,
>>> > I know we're all traveling and such, but this week while we're in
>>> > Berlin
>>> > might be a good opprotunity to cut 1.6.12.  We should be able to do
>>> > some
>>> > group review and testing while at elego's offices.  STATUS is starting
>>> > to
>>> > bulge again, and there are at least a couple of user-requested fixes in
>>> > that
>>> > file.
>>> >
>>> > Thoughts?
>>> >
>>> > -Hyrum
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Mark Phippard
>>> http://markphip.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>

Re: 1.6.12 tomorrow [was Re: 1.6.12 this week?]

[Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> I know people are still stumbling back into town from Berlin, but does
> rolling 1.6.12 tomorrow sound reasonable?  If so, I'll encourage folks
> to continue review, and I'll fire up my rolling environment.

I assume you guys went through STATUS together last week, but my main
comment would be that the items left in STATUS look more interesting
than the ones that have been identified as fixed in CHANGES.

If the items in STATUS are not likely to get the required approval,
then go ahead and release.  Otherwise, it seems like it would be
worthwhile to try to get STATUS cleaned out before doing a release.

-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

Re: 1.6.12 tomorrow [was Re: 1.6.12 this week?]

[Senthil Kumaran S <se...@collab.net>]

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> I know people are still stumbling back into town from Berlin, but does
> rolling 1.6.12 tomorrow sound reasonable?  If so, I'll encourage folks
> to continue review, and I'll fire up my rolling environment.

I am +1 for rolling tomorrow.

-- 
Senthil Kumaran S
http://www.stylesen.org/