You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com> on 2020/08/27 13:49:29 UTC
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Hello,
I think we are ready for a release right ?
Pending issues are:
- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
> Thanks for the answer.
> Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf:
>
> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626
> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453
>
> The first one being a blocker for any release.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Why not. The release process is fast.
>>
>> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?
>> >
>> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
>> > Windows OS making it partly unusable.
>> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
>> > The workaround is to switch to system LAF but users may not be aware of
>> > this.
>> >
>> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but
>> there
>> > are still now issues.
>> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one until
>> we
>> > have identified and fixed all issues.
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Philippe
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello Felix,
Ok.
Well we have to wait for Darklaf 2.4.10 as 2.4.9 fixed:
- https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/206
but introduced
- https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/210
Regards
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 22. September 2020 23:16:59 MESZ schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support <
> support@ubikloadpack.com>:
> >Hello,
> >How about releasing a 5.3.1 or 5.4 ?
>
> It feels like a 5.3.1 to me. If you ask a tool for sem ver, it will tell
> you otherwise :)
>
> >
> >I think we now have a stable version and it seems urgent to me to
> >release
>
> I have nothing left on my list (except curating the changes.xml with our
> current changes)
>
> Felix
>
> >it.
> >Regards
> >
> >On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:48 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
> >> > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
> >> >>> Pending issues are:
> >> >>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
> >> >
> >> >>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has
> >a
> >> >>> patch
> >> >> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
> >> >>
> >> >> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did
> >the
> >> >> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
> >> >>
> >> > I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
> >>
> >> Committed
> >>
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about
> >> freestyle
> >> >> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
> >> >>
> >> > Same for me, LGTM
> >>
> >> Committed
> >>
> >> Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI
> >elements,
> >> as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
> >> visible on MacOS, only.
> >>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >> >
> >> >> And what about #593?
> >> >>
> >> > ok by me
> >> >
> >> >>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a
> >version
> >> >>> soon.
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> Felix
> >> >>
> >> >>> Thanks
> >> >
> >>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 22. September 2020 23:16:59 MESZ schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support <su...@ubikloadpack.com>:
>Hello,
>How about releasing a 5.3.1 or 5.4 ?
It feels like a 5.3.1 to me. If you ask a tool for sem ver, it will tell you otherwise :)
>
>I think we now have a stable version and it seems urgent to me to
>release
I have nothing left on my list (except curating the changes.xml with our current changes)
Felix
>it.
>Regards
>
>On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:48 PM Felix Schumacher <
>felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
>> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
>> > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
>> >>>
>> >>> I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
>> >>>
>> >>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
>> >>> Pending issues are:
>> >>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>> >
>> >>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has
>a
>> >>> patch
>> >> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
>> >>
>> >> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did
>the
>> >> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
>> >>
>> > I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
>>
>> Committed
>>
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about
>> freestyle
>> >> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
>> >>
>> > Same for me, LGTM
>>
>> Committed
>>
>> Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI
>elements,
>> as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
>> visible on MacOS, only.
>>
>> Felix
>>
>> >
>> >> And what about #593?
>> >>
>> > ok by me
>> >
>> >>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a
>version
>> >>> soon.
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >
>>
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by UBIK LOAD PACK Support <su...@ubikloadpack.com>.
Hello,
How about releasing a 5.3.1 or 5.4 ?
I think we now have a stable version and it seems urgent to me to release
it.
Regards
On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 12:48 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
> Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
> > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >>> Hello,
> >>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
> >>>
> >>> I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
> >>>
> >>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
> >>> Pending issues are:
> >>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
> >
> >>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
> >>> patch
> >> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
> >>
> >> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the
> >> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
> >>
> > I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
>
> Committed
>
>
> >
> >
> >> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about
> freestyle
> >> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
> >>
> > Same for me, LGTM
>
> Committed
>
> Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI elements,
> as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
> visible on MacOS, only.
>
> Felix
>
> >
> >> And what about #593?
> >>
> > ok by me
> >
> >>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
> >>> soon.
> >> +1
> >>
> >> Felix
> >>
> >>> Thanks
> >
>
--
Regards
Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team
Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Cordialement
L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com>
Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 29.08.20 um 21:53 schrieb UBIK LOAD PACK Support:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>>
>> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>> Hello,
>>> Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
>>>
>>> I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
>>>
>>> I think we are ready for a release right ?
>>> Pending issues are:
>>> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>
>>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
>>> patch
>> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
>>
>> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the
>> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
>>
> I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
Committed
>
>
>> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle
>> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
>>
> Same for me, LGTM
Committed
Especially MacOS users should have a look at the refactored UI elements,
as I changed a few lines, that had a reference to a UI bug, that was
visible on MacOS, only.
Felix
>
>> And what about #593?
>>
> ok by me
>
>>> Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
>>> soon.
>> +1
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>> Thanks
>
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by UBIK LOAD PACK Support <su...@ubikloadpack.com>.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 4:41 PM Felix Schumacher <
felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
> >Hello,
> >Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
> >
> >I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
> >
> >I think we are ready for a release right ?
> >Pending issues are:
> >- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>
> >- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
> >patch
> >from Felix waiting for confirmation
>
> Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the
> original implementation, if I recall correctly.
>
I had a look, and left a comment on bugzilla, it LGTM.
> Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle
> naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
>
Same for me, LGTM
>
> And what about #593?
>
ok by me
>
> >
> >Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
> >soon.
>
> +1
>
> Felix
>
> >Thanks
>
--
Regards
Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com> Team
Follow us on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Cordialement
L'équipe Ubik Load Pack <http://ubikloadpack.com>
Suivez-nous sur Twitter <http://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de>.
Am 27. August 2020 15:53:31 MESZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>:
>Hello,
>Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
>
>I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
>
>I think we are ready for a release right ?
>Pending issues are:
>- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a
>patch
>from Felix waiting for confirmation
Here it would be nice, if you could have a look at it, as you did the original implementation, if I recall correctly.
Another pr (#595) that could probably be merged is the one about freestyle naming for samples recorded by the proxy.
And what about #593?
>
>Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version
>soon.
+1
Felix
>Thanks
Re: Release a new version 5.3.1 ?
Posted by Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
Oups previous mail was sent too fast.
I hope you're all fine and have spent nice holidays if you did.
I think we are ready for a release right ?
Pending issues are:
- https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
- https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64624 which has a patch
from Felix waiting for confirmation
Since 5.3 has some regressions, it would be nice to release a version soon.
Thanks
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
>
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Philippe Mouawad <ph...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think we are ready for a release right ?
> Pending issues are:
> - https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/608 for bug 64553
>
> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Thanks for the answer.
>> Unfortunately, we need to wait for 3 fixes in Darklaf:
>>
>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64626
>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64625
>> - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64453
>>
>> The first one being a blocker for any release.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 26, 2020 at 7:49 PM Milamber <mi...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Why not. The release process is fast.
>>>
>>> On 7/25/20 1:14 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote:
>>> > Hello,
>>> > Shouldn’t we release a new version 5.3.1 ?
>>> >
>>> > The 5.3 version has many GUI issues that are particularly visible on
>>> > Windows OS making it partly unusable.
>>> > Some are visible on all OS particularly with popular 3rd party plugins.
>>> > The workaround is to switch to system LAF but users may not be aware
>>> of
>>> > this.
>>> >
>>> > There has been many fixes on Darklaf thanks to Jannis reactivity but
>>> there
>>> > are still now issues.
>>> > I wonder if we should not switch LAF on windows to the system one
>>> until we
>>> > have identified and fixed all issues.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Philippe
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.