You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@felix.apache.org by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org> on 2007/07/23 18:04:02 UTC
[VOTE] Community Process and Roles
As part of the incubator process, the Felix project defined a set of
community roles and processes to explain how participation in the Felix
project works. This document needs to be updated now that Felix has
graduated from the incubator. The following is the updated document:
http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/apache-felix-community-roles-and-processes.html
For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
vote on accepting this document:
[ ] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
[ ] 0 - Don't care.
[ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
[RESULT] Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
This vote on the community process and roles is long over due to be
called; the votes were:
* +1 votes from Richard S. Hall, Emil Ivov, Stuart McCulloch, Niclas
Hedhman, Karl Pauls, Alex Karasulu, Didier Donsez, Carsten
Ziegeler, Marcel Offermans.
* 0 votes from no one.
* -1 votes from no one.
The vote has passed. Thanks to those who have participated.
-> richard
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> As part of the incubator process, the Felix project defined a set of
> community roles and processes to explain how participation in the
> Felix project works. This document needs to be updated now that Felix
> has graduated from the incubator. The following is the updated document:
>
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/apache-felix-community-roles-and-processes.html
>
>
> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
> incubator references are removed and some points are clarified
> further. Please vote on accepting this document:
>
> [ ] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Carsten Ziegeler <cz...@apache.org>.
[X] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
Carsten
--
Carsten Ziegeler
cziegeler@apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Stuart McCulloch <st...@jayway.net>.
+1
--
Cheers, Stuart
On 24/07/07, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
> As part of the incubator process, the Felix project defined a set of
> community roles and processes to explain how participation in the Felix
> project works. This document needs to be updated now that Felix has
> graduated from the incubator. The following is the updated document:
>
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/apache-felix-community-roles-and-processes.html
>
> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
> vote on accepting this document:
>
> [ ] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Marcel Offermans <ma...@luminis.nl>.
+1
RE: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Didier Donsez <di...@imag.fr>.
+1
Didier
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>
>>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
>>> incubator
>>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
>>> vote on accepting this document:
>>>
>>>
>> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
>> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>>
>> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting
>> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff.
>> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
>> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more
>> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly
>> fading away... :o(
>>
>
> I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
> document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
> decided by laziness. :-)
>
>> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the
>> long run to make it solid...
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -> richard
>
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
robw@ascert.com
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
+1
On 7/26/07, Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> regards,
>
> Karl
>
> On 7/24/07, Clement Escoffier <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Clement
> >
> > Richard S. Hall wrote:
> > > Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> > >> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
> > >>> incubator
> > >>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
> > >>> vote on accepting this document:
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> > >> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> > >> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
> > >>
> > >> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting
> > >> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff.
> > >> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
> > >> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more
> > >> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly
> > >> fading away... :o(
> > >>
> > >
> > > I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
> > > document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
> > > decided by laziness. :-)
> > >
> > >> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the
> > >> long run to make it solid...
> > >>
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > -> richard
> > >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
> > robw@ascert.com
> > +44 (0)20 7488 3470
> > www.ascert.com
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Karl Pauls
> karlpauls@gmail.com
>
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Karl Pauls <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1
regards,
Karl
On 7/24/07, Clement Escoffier <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Clement
>
> Richard S. Hall wrote:
> > Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> >> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> >>
> >>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
> >>> incubator
> >>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
> >>> vote on accepting this document:
> >>>
> >>>
> >> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> >> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> >> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
> >>
> >> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting
> >> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff.
> >> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
> >> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more
> >> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly
> >> fading away... :o(
> >>
> >
> > I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
> > document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
> > decided by laziness. :-)
> >
> >> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the
> >> long run to make it solid...
> >>
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -> richard
> >
>
> --
>
>
> Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
> robw@ascert.com
> +44 (0)20 7488 3470
> www.ascert.com
>
>
--
Karl Pauls
karlpauls@gmail.com
RE: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Clement Escoffier <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1
Clement
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>
>>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
>>> incubator
>>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
>>> vote on accepting this document:
>>>
>>>
>> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
>> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>>
>> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting
>> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff.
>> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
>> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more
>> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly
>> fading away... :o(
>>
>
> I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
> document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
> decided by laziness. :-)
>
>> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the
>> long run to make it solid...
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -> richard
>
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
robw@ascert.com
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Rob Walker <ro...@ascert.com>.
+1
... or just consider me as having "lazy consensus"
- Rob
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman wrote:
>> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>>
>>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
>>> incubator
>>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
>>> vote on accepting this document:
>>>
>>>
>> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
>> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
>> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>>
>> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting
>> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff.
>> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
>> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more
>> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly
>> fading away... :o(
>>
>
> I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
> document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
> decided by laziness. :-)
>
>> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the
>> long run to make it solid...
>>
>
> Thanks.
>
> -> richard
>
--
Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge
robw@ascert.com
+44 (0)20 7488 3470
www.ascert.com
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
>
>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
>> vote on accepting this document:
>>
>>
> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>
> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting is not
> truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff. "Hey, I made the
> following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
>
> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more than was
> originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly fading
> away... :o(
>
I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
decided by laziness. :-)
> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the long run
> to make it solid...
>
Thanks.
-> richard
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>.
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
> vote on accepting this document:
>
[x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
[ ] 0 - Don't care.
[ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting is not
truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff. "Hey, I made the
following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more than was
originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly fading
away... :o(
Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the long run
to make it solid...
Cheers
Niclas
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by "Richard S. Hall" <he...@ungoverned.org>.
+1
-> richard
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> As part of the incubator process, the Felix project defined a set of
> community roles and processes to explain how participation in the
> Felix project works. This document needs to be updated now that Felix
> has graduated from the incubator. The following is the updated document:
>
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/apache-felix-community-roles-and-processes.html
>
>
> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the
> incubator references are removed and some points are clarified
> further. Please vote on accepting this document:
>
> [ ] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>
Re: [VOTE] Community Process and Roles
Posted by Emil Ivov <em...@emcho.com>.
+1
Emil
Richard S. Hall wrote:
> As part of the incubator process, the Felix project defined a set of
> community roles and processes to explain how participation in the Felix
> project works. This document needs to be updated now that Felix has
> graduated from the incubator. The following is the updated document:
>
>
> http://cwiki.apache.org/FELIX/apache-felix-community-roles-and-processes.html
>
> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
> vote on accepting this document:
>
> [ ] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
> [ ] 0 - Don't care.
> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
>
>