You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2013/12/10 18:28:47 UTC
Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
--
Hiram Chirino
Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
All good from me now
On 11 Dec 2013, at 10:43, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> All good on my side.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - presumably
>> that won’t be far away ?
>>
>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>>
>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>
>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>
>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>
>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>
>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>
>> Rob Davies
>> ————————
>> Red Hat, Inc
>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>> Twitter: rajdavies
>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>>
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
So removing something as visual as a console should be a point release (5.10) - and we have a large number of critical issues open (currently 20) - we should try get those resolved or properly assessed. Hopefully we can get 5.10 out really quickly.
On 15 Jan 2014, at 21:44, Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The issue is now fixed. Time to finally cut 5.9.1? I volunteer to do it if no objections or other takers.
>
> Hadrian
>
>
>
> On 01/02/2014 04:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Joshua Watkins <jo...@gamesys.co.uk> wrote:
>> This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on
>>> something?
>>
>>
>> I *think* there were a couple remaining things:
>>
>> 1) Removing the hawt.io stuff to meet Apache requirements. I submitted a pull request for this today. Hopefully someone can pick it up and get it committed.
>>
>> 2) Figuring out why the ActiveMQ feature cannot be installed into Karaf. Basically makes it very hard to get ActiveMQ running in OSGi. (AMQ-4833) I spent some time on this today and logged an issue with Maven Central. Hopefully they can open up the restrictions on their end. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2536 is also logged for this. Anyway, not something that the ActiveMQ community can do anything about so likely not a holdup anymore.
>>
>> Anyone have anything else?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Josh
>>>
>>> On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies
>>>>> <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> a
>>>>>>> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade
>>>>>> from
>>>>>>> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1
>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
>>>>>> within
>>>>>>>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get
>>>>>> ClassNotFoundExceptions
>>>>>>>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter
>>>>>> which
>>>>>> was
>>>>>>>> introduced in later versions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani*
>>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open
>>>>>> Source
>>>>>>>> Integration specialist
>>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>> <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> All good on my side.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies
>>>>>> <ra...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I¹m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>>>>>>>> presumably
>>>>>>>>>> that won¹t be far away ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the
>>>>>> leveldb
>>>>>>>>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Hadrian Zbarcea <hz...@gmail.com>.
The issue is now fixed. Time to finally cut 5.9.1? I volunteer to do it
if no objections or other takers.
Hadrian
On 01/02/2014 04:28 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Joshua Watkins <jo...@gamesys.co.uk> wrote:
> This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on
>> something?
>
>
> I *think* there were a couple remaining things:
>
> 1) Removing the hawt.io stuff to meet Apache requirements. I submitted a pull request for this today. Hopefully someone can pick it up and get it committed.
>
> 2) Figuring out why the ActiveMQ feature cannot be installed into Karaf. Basically makes it very hard to get ActiveMQ running in OSGi. (AMQ-4833) I spent some time on this today and logged an issue with Maven Central. Hopefully they can open up the restrictions on their end. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2536 is also logged for this. Anyway, not something that the ActiveMQ community can do anything about so likely not a holdup anymore.
>
> Anyone have anything else?
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Josh
>>
>> On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> --
>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>> ----------------------
>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies
>>>> <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>>>>> and
>>>>>> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix
>>>>> for
>>>>> a
>>>>>> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade
>>>>> from
>>>>>> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi
>>>>> and
>>>>>> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1
>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
>>>>> within
>>>>>>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get
>>>>> ClassNotFoundExceptions
>>>>>>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter
>>>>> which
>>>>> was
>>>>>>> introduced in later versions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani*
>>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open
>>>>> Source
>>>>>>> Integration specialist
>>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All good on my side.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies
>>>>> <ra...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I¹m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>>>>>>> presumably
>>>>>>>>> that won¹t be far away ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the
>>>>> leveldb
>>>>>>>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:30 AM, Joshua Watkins <jo...@gamesys.co.uk> wrote:
This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on
> something?
I *think* there were a couple remaining things:
1) Removing the hawt.io stuff to meet Apache requirements. I submitted a pull request for this today. Hopefully someone can pick it up and get it committed.
2) Figuring out why the ActiveMQ feature cannot be installed into Karaf. Basically makes it very hard to get ActiveMQ running in OSGi. (AMQ-4833) I spent some time on this today and logged an issue with Maven Central. Hopefully they can open up the restrictions on their end. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-2536 is also logged for this. Anyway, not something that the ActiveMQ community can do anything about so likely not a holdup anymore.
Anyone have anything else?
Dan
>
>
> Regards,
> Josh
>
> On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>> ----------------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies
>>> <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>>>
>>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>>>> and
>>>>> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix
>>>> for
>>>> a
>>>>> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade
>>>> from
>>>>> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi
>>>> and
>>>>> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1
>>>> release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
>>>> within
>>>>>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get
>>>> ClassNotFoundExceptions
>>>>>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter
>>>> which
>>>> was
>>>>>> introduced in later versions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Raúl Kripalani*
>>>>>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open
>>>> Source
>>>>>> Integration specialist
>>>>>> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>>>>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac
>>>> <de...@nighttale.net>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> All good on my side.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>>>>>> ----------------------
>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>>>>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>>>>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>>>>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies
>>>> <ra...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I¹m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>>>>>> presumably
>>>>>>>> that won¹t be far away ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the
>>>> leveldb
>>>>>>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rob Davies
>>>>>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>>>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>>>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>>>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>>>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Rob Davies
>>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Joshua Watkins <jo...@gamesys.co.uk>.
This topic seems to have stalled. Is the release still waiting on
something?
Regards,
Josh
On 11/12/2013 16:23, "Dejan Bosanac" <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
>
>Regards
>--
>Dejan Bosanac
>----------------------
>Red Hat, Inc.
>FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>dbosanac@redhat.com
>Twitter: @dejanb
>Blog: http://sensatic.net
>ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
>On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>wrote:
>
>> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>>
>> Regards
>> --
>> Dejan Bosanac
>> ----------------------
>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies
>><ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>>
>>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>>> and
>>> > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix
>>>for
>>> a
>>> > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade
>>>from
>>> > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi
>>>and
>>> > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > --
>>> > Dejan Bosanac
>>> > ----------------------
>>> > Red Hat, Inc.
>>> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> > dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> > Twitter: @dejanb
>>> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1
>>>release?
>>> >>
>>> >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
>>> within
>>> >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>> >>
>>> >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get
>>>ClassNotFoundExceptions
>>> >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter
>>>which
>>> was
>>> >> introduced in later versions.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> *Raúl Kripalani*
>>> >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open
>>>Source
>>> >> Integration specialist
>>> >> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>>> >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac
>>><de...@nighttale.net>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> All good on my side.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Regards
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> >>> ----------------------
>>> >>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> >>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> >>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies
>>><ra...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> I¹m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>>> >> presumably
>>> >>>> that won¹t be far away ?
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the
>>> leveldb
>>> >>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> --
>>> >>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Rob Davies
>>> >>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>> >>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>> >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>> >>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>> >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> Rob Davies
>>> ‹‹‹‹‹‹‹‹
>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 is now fixed.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>>
>> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>>
>> > I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi
>> and
>> > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for
>> a
>> > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from
>> > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and
>> > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > --
>> > Dejan Bosanac
>> > ----------------------
>> > Red Hat, Inc.
>> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> > dbosanac@redhat.com
>> > Twitter: @dejanb
>> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
>> >>
>> >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
>> within
>> >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>> >>
>> >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
>> >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which
>> was
>> >> introduced in later versions.
>> >>
>> >> Regards,
>> >>
>> >> *Raúl Kripalani*
>> >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
>> >> Integration specialist
>> >> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
>> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> All good on my side.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards
>> >>> --
>> >>> Dejan Bosanac
>> >>> ----------------------
>> >>> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>> >>> Twitter: @dejanb
>> >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>> >> presumably
>> >>>> that won’t be far away ?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the
>> leveldb
>> >>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> --
>> >>>>> Hiram Chirino
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Rob Davies
>> >>>> ————————
>> >>>> Red Hat, Inc
>> >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>> >>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>> >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>> Rob Davies
>> ————————
>> Red Hat, Inc
>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>> Twitter: rajdavies
>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>
>>
>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
Or just explain upgrade path it in release notes. I'll get it fixed now.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
>
> On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
>
> > I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi and
> > use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for a
> > minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from
> > 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and
> > add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> > dbosanac@redhat.com
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Would there be a chance to take a look at
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
> >>
> >> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker
> within
> >> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
> >>
> >> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
> >> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which
> was
> >> introduced in later versions.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> *Raúl Kripalani*
> >> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
> >> Integration specialist
> >> http://about.me/raulkripalani |
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> >> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
> >>
> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> All good on my side.
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> --
> >>> Dejan Bosanac
> >>> ----------------------
> >>> Red Hat, Inc.
> >>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >>> dbosanac@redhat.com
> >>> Twitter: @dejanb
> >>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> >>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
> >> presumably
> >>>> that won’t be far away ?
> >>>>
> >>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
> >>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Hiram Chirino
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >>>>>
> >>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> >>>>
> >>>> Rob Davies
> >>>> ————————
> >>>> Red Hat, Inc
> >>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> >>>> Twitter: rajdavies
> >>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> >>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
> Rob Davies
> ————————
> Red Hat, Inc
> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> Twitter: rajdavies
> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
Why not just go for a 5.10 and get this fixed ?
On 11 Dec 2013, at 11:13, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi and
> use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for a
> minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from
> 5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and
> add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would there be a chance to take a look at
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
>>
>> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker within
>> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>>
>> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
>> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which was
>> introduced in later versions.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> *Raúl Kripalani*
>> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
>> Integration specialist
>> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
>> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> All good on my side.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> --
>>> Dejan Bosanac
>>> ----------------------
>>> Red Hat, Inc.
>>> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>>> dbosanac@redhat.com
>>> Twitter: @dejanb
>>> Blog: http://sensatic.net
>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
>> presumably
>>>> that won’t be far away ?
>>>>
>>>> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
>>>>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Hiram Chirino
>>>>>
>>>>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>>>>
>>>>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>>>>
>>>>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>>>>
>>>> Rob Davies
>>>> ————————
>>>> Red Hat, Inc
>>>> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
>>>> Twitter: rajdavies
>>>> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
>>>> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
I agree with this. We should remove activemq-camel from activemq-osgi and
use it as a separate bundle. I'm not sure though if it's a good fix for a
minor release as we need to change features as well. Also upgrade from
5.9.0 to 5.9.1 in karat would mean you need to upgrade activemq-osgi and
add activemq-camel. What do you guys think?
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would there be a chance to take a look at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
>
> This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker within
> an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
>
> Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
> because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which was
> introduced in later versions.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Raúl Kripalani*
> Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
> Integration specialist
> http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
> http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>
> wrote:
>
> > All good on my side.
> >
> > Regards
> > --
> > Dejan Bosanac
> > ----------------------
> > Red Hat, Inc.
> > FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> > dbosanac@redhat.com
> > Twitter: @dejanb
> > Blog: http://sensatic.net
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 -
> presumably
> > > that won’t be far away ?
> > >
> > > On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
> > > > bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Hiram Chirino
> > > >
> > > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > > >
> > > > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > > >
> > > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > > >
> > > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> > >
> > > Rob Davies
> > > ————————
> > > Red Hat, Inc
> > > http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> > > Twitter: rajdavies
> > > Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> > > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Raul Kripalani <ra...@evosent.com>.
Hi,
Would there be a chance to take a look at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-4909 for the 5.9.1 release?
This is a blocker that prevents users from upgrading the AMQ broker within
an Karaf / ServiceMix container, if they also use Camel.
Try upgrading from AMQ 5.8 to 5.9, and you get ClassNotFoundExceptions
because activemq-camel 5.9.0 expects the Camel EndpointCompleter which was
introduced in later versions.
Regards,
*Raúl Kripalani*
Apache Camel PMC Member & Committer | Enterprise Architect, Open Source
Integration specialist
http://about.me/raulkripalani | http://www.linkedin.com/in/raulkripalani
http://blog.raulkr.net | twitter: @raulvk
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net> wrote:
> All good on my side.
>
> Regards
> --
> Dejan Bosanac
> ----------------------
> Red Hat, Inc.
> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> dbosanac@redhat.com
> Twitter: @dejanb
> Blog: http://sensatic.net
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - presumably
> > that won’t be far away ?
> >
> > On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> >
> > > How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
> > > bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Hiram Chirino
> > >
> > > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> > >
> > > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> > >
> > > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> > >
> > > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
> >
> > Rob Davies
> > ————————
> > Red Hat, Inc
> > http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> > Twitter: rajdavies
> > Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> > ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
> >
> >
>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Dejan Bosanac <de...@nighttale.net>.
All good on my side.
Regards
--
Dejan Bosanac
----------------------
Red Hat, Inc.
FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
dbosanac@redhat.com
Twitter: @dejanb
Blog: http://sensatic.net
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - presumably
> that won’t be far away ?
>
> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
> > How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
> > bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
> >
> > --
> > Hiram Chirino
> >
> > Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
> >
> > hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> >
> > skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
> >
> > blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>
> Rob Davies
> ————————
> Red Hat, Inc
> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> Twitter: rajdavies
> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
>
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
Hopefully get this fixed in the next hour or so
On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:31, Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - presumably that won’t be far away ?
>
> On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
>
>> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
>> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>>
>> --
>> Hiram Chirino
>>
>> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>>
>> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>>
>> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>>
>> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
>
> Rob Davies
> ————————
> Red Hat, Inc
> http://hawt.io - #dontcha
> Twitter: rajdavies
> Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
> ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
>
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/
Re: Cutting a 5.9.1 release??
Posted by Robert Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
I’m having a look at AMQ-4924 - but that can wait till 5.10 - presumably that won’t be far away ?
On 10 Dec 2013, at 17:28, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> How we looking for 5.9.1 release? I'm happy now with how the leveldb
> bits are looking. Any outstanding bits left to do?
>
> --
> Hiram Chirino
>
> Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.
>
> hchirino@redhat.com | fusesource.com | redhat.com
>
> skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino
>
> blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo
Rob Davies
————————
Red Hat, Inc
http://hawt.io - #dontcha
Twitter: rajdavies
Blog: http://rajdavies.blogspot.com
ActiveMQ in Action: http://www.manning.com/snyder/