You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by Roland Schwingel <Ro...@onevision.de> on 2003/10/13 08:41:08 UTC
Re: Subversion 0.30.0 stability problems : not able to check in bigger
pieces - just for the records
Hi.....
Just for the records
> On weekend I will disable one cpu on my dual machine and make again a
test
> with BDB 4.1.25 (and a run with memtest86)
Did this on weekend. 11hours memntest86 did not show up any memory
problems.
Made some tests with 1 and 2 CPUs and berkeley db 4.0.14 and 4.1.25.
Each test with a brand new repos and a testcheckin of apache.
As desribed in my initial report. But each loop was done 20 times.
In 2 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.0.14 works well. No problems.
In 1 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.0.14 works well. No problems.
In 2 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.1.25 showed up the same errors. Starting
with the first checkin
In 1 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.1.25 worked nearly well. In 1 of 20
cases it failed as well..
So I am running now with svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.0.14.
Roland
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 0.30.0 stability problems : not able to check in bigger pieces - just for the records
Posted by "C. Michael Pilato" <cm...@collab.net>.
Roland Schwingel <Ro...@onevision.de> writes:
> In 2 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.0.14 works well. No problems.
> In 1 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.0.14 works well. No problems.
> In 2 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.1.25 showed up the same errors. Starting
> with the first checkin
> In 1 CPU mode svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.1.25 worked nearly well. In 1 of 20
> cases it failed as well..
Roland, you rock. Thank you for taking to time to drill into this
weirdness a bit. While I certainly can't explain your findings
(beyond an initial guess of "there must be a bug in 4.1.25 or our use
of it"), I sincerely appreciate someone putting real faces on the
vague notions of instability that have been wafting through the list
as of late.
> So I am running now with svn 0.31.0 and bdb 4.0.14.
This, it would seem, is probably a good idea. :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org