You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> on 2007/08/15 22:39:34 UTC

[VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
Thanks gents !

I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
log for the changes to the release notes for more information.

The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1

I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.

Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread  
for issues / discussion items.

[ ] +1 Release these binaries
[ ] 0 No opinion
[ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)

This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Paul McMahan <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1

On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by "Jay D. McHugh" <ja...@joyfulnoisewebdesign.com>.
+1

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated 
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change 
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
+1

-Donald

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the 
> security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log 
> for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 
> 

Re: Are geronimo 2.0.1 artifacts availble in maven2 repo?

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 8/22/07, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Congratulations on the Geronimo 2.0.1 release. Are the released artifacts
> availble in maven2 repo now?

No, they're not. I think they'll be before the press announcement.

BTW, I've been wondering why they are not and run into issues with
them missing while building Geronimo Eclipse plugin, so I'm awaiting
them to be available too ;-)

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: Are geronimo 2.0.1 artifacts availble in maven2 repo?

Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Done

On Aug 22, 2007, at 5:45 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Congratulations on the Geronimo 2.0.1 release. Are the released  
> artifacts availble in maven2 repo now?
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>


Are geronimo 2.0.1 artifacts availble in maven2 repo?

Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Hi,

Congratulations on the Geronimo 2.0.1 release. Are the released artifacts 
availble in maven2 repo now?

Thanks,
Raymond 


Re: [RESULT Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1) Passes with +1 = 20 votes with no other votes recorded

Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Thanks ... ugh ... totally missed the to ... Kevan, you da man

On Aug 21, 2007, at 5:33 PM, Kevan Miller wrote:

> Forwarding the "result" from user list to our dev list...
>
> On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> Subject says it all...I'll start pushing out the binaries this  
>> morning.
>>
>> I know the vote concluded on Saturday and my apologies but I was  
>> away over the weekend and there weren't no wireless where I was :)
>>
>> On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>>
>>> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have  
>>> incorporated the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan  
>>> and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
>>>
>>> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the  
>>> change log for the changes to the release notes for more  
>>> information.
>>>
>>> The binaries and source are available at:  http:// 
>>> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>>>
>>> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
>>> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
>>> components.
>>>
>>> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
>>> thread for issues / discussion items.
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>>> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>>>
>>> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>>>
>>
>
>


[RESULT Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1) Passes with +1 = 20 votes with no other votes recorded

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Forwarding the "result" from user list to our dev list...

On Aug 20, 2007, at 9:56 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Subject says it all...I'll start pushing out the binaries this  
> morning.
>
> I know the vote concluded on Saturday and my apologies but I was  
> away over the weekend and there weren't no wireless where I was :)
>
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have  
>> incorporated the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan  
>> and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
>>
>> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the  
>> change log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>>
>> The binaries and source are available at:  http:// 
>> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>>
>> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
>> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
>> components.
>>
>> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
>> thread for issues / discussion items.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>>
>> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>>
>


[RESULT Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1) Passes with +1 = 20 votes with no other votes recorded

Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Subject says it all...I'll start pushing out the binaries this morning.

I know the vote concluded on Saturday and my apologies but I was away  
over the weekend and there weren't no wireless where I was :)

On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
+1

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the 
> security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log 
> for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Tim McConnell

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Tim McConnell <ti...@gmail.com>.
+1

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the 
> security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log 
> for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Tim McConnell

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Vamsavardhana Reddy <c1...@gmail.com>.
+1

Vamsi

On 8/16/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
>
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread
> for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Paul Craton <CR...@uk.ibm.com>.
My +1


Paul Craton





Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> 
17/08/2007 02:58
Please respond to
user@geronimo.apache.org


To
user@geronimo.apache.org
cc

Subject
Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)






My +1


On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated 
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi. 
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change 
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other 
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS 
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>








Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU






Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
My +1


On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Hernan Cunico <hc...@gmail.com>.
+1

Cheers!
Hernan

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the 
> security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log 
> for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Shiva Kumar H R <sh...@gmail.com>.
My +1 too.

All my sample web-apps (in GERONIMO-3254) work successfully except for the
problem that was reported in GERONIMO-3380, but that's a non-blocker.

- Shiva


On 8/17/07, Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1.  Thanks for pulling the artifacts together for vote!
>
> Lin
>
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> > The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the
> > security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks
> gents !
> >
> > I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log
> > for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> >
> > The binaries and source are available at:
> > http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> >
> > I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub
> > directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> >
> > Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread
> > for issues / discussion items.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> > [ ] 0 No opinion
> > [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> >
> > This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> >
>
>

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Lin Sun <li...@gmail.com>.
+1.  Thanks for pulling the artifacts together for vote!

Lin

Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the 
> security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log 
> for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Jarek Gawor <jg...@gmail.com>.
+1.

A bad plan (the service-ref specifies a wrong endpoint address) is
causing two jax-ws tests to fail in the webservices testsuite (it's my
fault for including a version number in the endpoint address - this
has been addressed in trunk and 2.0 branches).
This is definitely not a critical issue and can be ignored for this release.

Jarek

On 8/15/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread
> for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
+1

David

On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
My +1.

On Aug 17, 2007, at 9:00 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> Sent my vote to the user list by accident.
>
> Here is my official +1
>
> On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>
>> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have  
>> incorporated the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan  
>> and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
>>
>> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the  
>> change log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>>
>> The binaries and source are available at:  http:// 
>> people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>>
>> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
>> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
>> components.
>>
>> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
>> thread for issues / discussion items.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>>
>> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>>


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
Sent my vote to the user list by accident.

Here is my official +1

On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
+1

david jencks
On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.

Joe Bohn wrote:
> Here's my +1 assuming TCK is still 100% (tests are still running).

...  and I've just verified that all of the TCK tests still pass on both 
default configurations (Tomcat/Axis2 & Jetty/CXF).  w00t!

> Joe
> 
> 
> Matt Hogstrom wrote:
>> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated 
>> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  
>> Thanks gents !
>>
>> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change 
>> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>>
>> The binaries and source are available at:  
>> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>>
>> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
>> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
>>
>> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
>> for issues / discussion items.
>>
>> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>>
>> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>>
> 

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
Here's my +1 assuming TCK is still 100% (tests are still running).

Joe


Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated the 
> security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.  Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change log 
> for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  
> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub 
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread 
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
[X] +1 Release these binaries

p.s. Couldn't think of a better (morning) present right after the long
holidays of mine are over - being able to vote for 2.0.1.

Jacek

On 8/15/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread
> for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>


-- 
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
+1
--kevan
On Aug 15, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1


Regards,
Alan

On Aug 15, 2007, at 1:39 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Prasad Kashyap <go...@gmail.com>.
 My +1 too

Cheers
Prasad

On 8/15/07, Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:
> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread
> for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
>

Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Gianny Damour <gi...@optusnet.com.au>.
+1

Gianny

On 16/08/2007, at 6:39 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
>
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
>
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
>
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other  
> components.
>
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS  
> thread for issues / discussion items.
>
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
>
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.


Re: [VOTE] Geronimo 2.0.1 (rc1)

Posted by Anita Kulshreshtha <a_...@yahoo.com>.
+1

Anita

--- Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org> wrote:

> The updated binaries are available for review.  I have incorporated  
> the security changes provided by David Jencks, Kevan and Vamsi.   
> Thanks gents !
> 
> I also incorporated a few additional fixes.  Please note the change  
> log for the changes to the release notes for more information.
> 
> The binaries and source are available at:  http://people.apache.org/ 
> ~hogstrom/geronimo-2.0.1-rc1
> 
> I have placed the uber repo jar in the main directory with sub  
> directories of src and assemblies respectively for the other
> components.
> 
> Please don't comment in this thread but rather use the DISCUSS thread
>  
> for issues / discussion items.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release these binaries
> [ ] 0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release (please provide rationale)
> 
> This vote will conclude on Saturday August 18th at 1700.
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need a vacation? Get great deals
to amazing places on Yahoo! Travel.
http://travel.yahoo.com/