You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> on 2006/08/18 03:40:07 UTC
What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
What is the right m2 repo to use to pick up the 4.x series?
I'm trying to get G 1.2/trunk to use one consistent version... but I
can't find it.
--jason
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Great *sarcasm* yet another repository :-( But thanks for the heads up.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:25 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> On 8/18/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 4.0.x only uses m1, to use m2 you need to use the 4.1-SNAPSHOT (or
>> trunk in SVN)
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
>> activemq/apache-activemq/
>
> BTW as soon as the 4.1 release is ready it looks like we now have an
> m2 repository we can deploy incubating project releases to..
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/18/06, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 4.0.x only uses m1, to use m2 you need to use the 4.1-SNAPSHOT (or trunk in SVN)
>
> http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/
BTW as soon as the 4.1 release is ready it looks like we now have an
m2 repository we can deploy incubating project releases to..
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> You guys gonna have that cooked by then end of the year?
Definitely. I expect 4.1 out in a couple of weeks time. Quite a few
projects are using 4.1-SNAPSHOT (due to the m2 support) so we need to
get 4.1 out ASAP.
> And is it stable enough to plugin asis?
Definitely.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
You guys gonna have that cooked by then end of the year?
And is it stable enough to plugin asis?
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:14 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> 4.0.x only uses m1, to use m2 you need to use the 4.1-SNAPSHOT (or
> trunk in SVN)
>
> http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
> activemq/apache-activemq/
>
>
> On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> What is the right m2 repo to use to pick up the 4.x series?
>>
>> I'm trying to get G 1.2/trunk to use one consistent version... but I
>> can't find it.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Not the groupId James... the artifactId.
Ah sorry - not had much coffee this morning...
> I totally get the groupId,
> but I noticed that the link you sent me was using:
>
> <groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
> <artifactId>apache-activemq</artifactId> <---------
>
> When I had expected it to keep using 'activemq'.
I think it was so that binary distros have both apache, activemq and
incubating in its name to comply with incubator policies. Note that
this is just for the assembly - the individual jars don't have this
(e.g. the activemq-core pom has an artifactId of activemq-core)
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Not the groupId James... the artifactId. I totally get the groupId,
but I noticed that the link you sent me was using:
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>apache-activemq</artifactId> <---------
When I had expected it to keep using 'activemq'.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:39 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Did they make you put the apache- prefix on their too?
>
> Noone made us - we just followed the convention of other m2 projects
> at apache. e.g. the groupId for all the maven artifacts is
> org.apache.maven; so we used org.apache.activemq so our stuff shows up
> in the same place in the m2 repos as other projects..
>
> e.g.
>
> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/
>
>> Or was that what you just said... I'm think headed today... not
>> enough crack to smoke in my pad.
>
> :)
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Did they make you put the apache- prefix on their too?
Noone made us - we just followed the convention of other m2 projects
at apache. e.g. the groupId for all the maven artifacts is
org.apache.maven; so we used org.apache.activemq so our stuff shows up
in the same place in the m2 repos as other projects..
e.g.
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-ibiblio-rsync-repository/org/apache/
> Or was that what you just said... I'm think headed today... not
> enough crack to smoke in my pad.
:)
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Did they make you put the apache- prefix on their too?
Or was that what you just said... I'm think headed today... not
enough crack to smoke in my pad.
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:30 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> Yikes... why did you guys include apache- in the artifact here? Was
>> this to be incubator compliant? Seems to deviate from previous
>> releases...
>
> Yeah - it was to follow suit with other m2 on incubating projects. We
> put the incuabting in the version rather than the groupId so folks
> won't have to switch groupIds whenever ActiveMQ graduates.
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Yikes... why did you guys include apache- in the artifact here? Was
> this to be incubator compliant? Seems to deviate from previous
> releases...
Yeah - it was to follow suit with other m2 on incubating projects. We
put the incuabting in the version rather than the groupId so folks
won't have to switch groupIds whenever ActiveMQ graduates.
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Yikes... why did you guys include apache- in the artifact here? Was
this to be incubator compliant? Seems to deviate from previous
releases...
--jason
On Aug 17, 2006, at 7:14 PM, James Strachan wrote:
> 4.0.x only uses m1, to use m2 you need to use the 4.1-SNAPSHOT (or
> trunk in SVN)
>
> http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/
> activemq/apache-activemq/
>
>
> On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
>> What is the right m2 repo to use to pick up the 4.x series?
>>
>> I'm trying to get G 1.2/trunk to use one consistent version... but I
>> can't find it.
>>
>> --jason
>>
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: What m2 repo to use to pick up 4.x?
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
4.0.x only uses m1, to use m2 you need to use the 4.1-SNAPSHOT (or trunk in SVN)
http://people.apache.org/maven-snapshot-repository/org/apache/activemq/apache-activemq/
On 8/18/06, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> What is the right m2 repo to use to pick up the 4.x series?
>
> I'm trying to get G 1.2/trunk to use one consistent version... but I
> can't find it.
>
> --jason
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/