You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@airflow.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/01/30 14:26:40 UTC

[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk opened a new pull request #21219: Simplify pull vs. build scenario in CI

potiuk opened a new pull request #21219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21219


   We used to have two options in our CI - one was to build the
   images in the "build" step and pull them in "ci/tests" steps, the
   other was to build the images in "ci/tests" steps as a backup,
   in case the build/ci workflows has some problems. It's likely been
   a year or more when we did not have to use the other workflow and
   since switching to GitHub Registry as cache it became extremely
   stable, which means that we can remove the option where the
   images might be build "on the spot" in the CI/tests steps.
   
   That involves few clarifications:
   
   * we can split `prepare` scripts into separate `pull` and `build`
     ones
   * the steps with `Prepare` name (which was - either pull or build)
     can use proper name (either Pull or Build)
   * GITHUB_REGISTRY_WAIT_FOR_IMAGE variable and corresponding
     BUILD_IMAGES_OVERRIDE and debug secret to enable "build in CI"
     flow can be removed
   * documentation is updated
   
   This will also allow to easier implement the equivalent steps
   in the "CI & Breeze" override project, as the steps will be now
   possible to replace with corresponding breeze's build-image/
   pull_image functions and calls.
   
   <!--
   Thank you for contributing! Please make sure that your code changes
   are covered with tests. And in case of new features or big changes
   remember to adjust the documentation.
   
   Feel free to ping committers for the review!
   
   In case of existing issue, reference it using one of the following:
   
   closes: #ISSUE
   related: #ISSUE
   
   How to write a good git commit message:
   http://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/
   -->
   
   ---
   **^ Add meaningful description above**
   
   Read the **[Pull Request Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)** for more information.
   In case of fundamental code change, Airflow Improvement Proposal ([AIP](https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Airflow+Improvements+Proposals)) is needed.
   In case of a new dependency, check compliance with the [ASF 3rd Party License Policy](https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x).
   In case of backwards incompatible changes please leave a note in [UPDATING.md](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/UPDATING.md).
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk commented on pull request #21219: Simplify pull vs. build scenario in CI

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk commented on pull request #21219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21219#issuecomment-1025155015


   cc:@Bowrna @edithturn - a  change to make your future tasks easier :)


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [airflow] github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #21219: Simplify pull vs. build scenario in CI

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #21219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21219#issuecomment-1025213945


   The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it quickly and take the risk. If they don't merge it quickly - please rebase it to the latest main at your convenience, or amend the last commit of the PR, and push it with --force-with-lease.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



[GitHub] [airflow] potiuk merged pull request #21219: Simplify pull vs. build scenario in CI

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
potiuk merged pull request #21219:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21219


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@airflow.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org