RE: [Synapse]RE: CryptoFactory:Cannotloadproperties:crypto.properties

[Soumadeep <so...@infravio.com>]

Sure Sanjiva :) , and putting it in the scratch is a good idea at least
people can comment on a concept and on acceptance we can put it in the main
code base.

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjiva Weerawarana [mailto:sanjiva@opensource.lk]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 2:21 PM
To: synapse-dev@ws.apache.org
Cc: Ruchith Fernando
Subject: RE: [Synapse]RE:
CryptoFactory:Cannotloadproperties:crypto.properties

On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 11:48 +0530, Soumadeep wrote:
> One more thing that I would like to emphasize here is that I do agree that
> all the development should happen in the repo, but from a realistic stand
> point as you may agree one can't keep writing a line of code and keep
> committing it but surely the scratch area should be fine.

Come on Soumadeep you know I didn't mean that every line should be
committed. In fact there are times when I go days without committing
changes because I'm not happy with some stuff. However, the diff is
there's no other place where the code is committed in a shared repo; I
may keep it on my machine for however long but from day 0 its meant to
go to ASF and I keep committing when I feel its good and ready to
commit.

The only reason to commit to the scratch area instead of the main tree
is if the stuff is really "scratch" .. otherwise if the code is an
improvement to the main direction of the project it belongs in the main
tree.

Sanjiva.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: synapse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: synapse-dev-help@ws.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: synapse-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: synapse-dev-help@ws.apache.org