You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@bloodhound.apache.org by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org> on 2012/08/12 00:47:45 UTC
[Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
#159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
-----------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: nobody
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
Component: trac core | Version:
Keywords: vendor |
-----------------------+-----------------------
Now that [https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/trac-
users/5fli6ekJMaM Trac 1.0beta1 is released] soon it will be necessary to
upgrade the copy in vendor branch to use version ''1.0'' and refresh
patches .
'''PS:''' I've set preliminary schedule to take a look at this during
''Release 3'' as maybe it's not an urgent task for ''Release 2'' . Feel
free to change it if you thinks that's not the case .
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor
branch
Posted by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>.
#159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
Type: task | Status: accepted
Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
Component: trac core | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
------------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by gjm):
r1398864 tags vendor/current to vendor/1.0
r1398968 merges trac 1.0 into trunk/trac
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:4>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor
branch
Posted by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>.
#159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
Type: task | Status: closed
Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
Component: trac core | Version:
Resolution: fixed | Keywords: vendor
------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by gjm):
* status: accepted => closed
* resolution: => fixed
Comment:
#239 raised to deal with obvious error as a result of the upgrade.
Otherwise assuming that this task is complete.
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:5>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor
branch
Posted by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>.
#159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: nobody
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
Component: trac core | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
------------------------+-----------------------
Description changed by olemis:
Old description:
> Now that [https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/trac-
> users/5fli6ekJMaM Trac 1.0beta1 is released] soon it will be necessary to
> upgrade the copy in vendor branch to use version ''1.0'' and refresh
> patches .
>
> '''PS:''' I've set preliminary schedule to take a look at this during
> ''Release 3'' as maybe it's not an urgent task for ''Release 2'' . Feel
> free to change it if you thinks that's not the case .
New description:
Now that [https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/trac-
users/5fli6ekJMaM Trac 1.0beta1 is released] soon it will be necessary to
upgrade the copy in vendor branch to use version ''1.0'' and refresh
patches .
'''PS:''' I've set preliminary schedule to take a look at this during
''Release 3'' as maybe it's not an urgent task for ''Release 2'' . Feel
free to change it if you think that's not the case .
--
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:1>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
I think it is probably about time for this. We will probably need a bit
of time to shake this change down and see if there are any problems
ready for the third release. If there are any major problems we can
always revert.
Cheers,
Gary
On 16/10/12 16:13, Apache Bloodhound wrote:
> #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
> ------------------------+-----------------------
> Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
> Type: task | Status: accepted
> Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
> Component: trac core | Version:
> Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
> ------------------------+-----------------------
> Changes (by gjm):
>
> * owner: nobody => gjm
> * status: new => accepted
>
>
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor
branch
Posted by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>.
#159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
Type: task | Status: accepted
Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
Component: trac core | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
------------------------+-----------------------
Changes (by gjm):
* owner: nobody => gjm
* status: new => accepted
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:2>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
Hi Olemis,
I believe there were two 'database' upgrades - one of these is
associated with changing where attachment files are stored while the
other is to migrate svn modules from trac.versioncontrol.* to
tracopt.versioncontrol.svn.*
The changes to attachments location may have implications for migration
tools if they simply move files to an expected location. It might be
safer to attempt to get Bloodhound to put attachments in the correct
locations instead.
Cheers,
Gary
On 17/10/12 07:19, Olemis Lang wrote:
> JFTR ... environment upgrade needed . Is it a big deal ?
>
> On 10/16/12, Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>> That was just updating the copy in vendor/trac/current - I have
>> subsequently tagged that version appropriately and merged the changes
>> into trunk/trac which keeps our patches.
>>
>> There is only one error that I have noted for which I believe I have
>> already found a fix. I will commit that in a second and I will update
>> the list with the commit email for review.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Gary
>>
>> On 16/10/12 17:25, Olemis Lang wrote:
>>> I think it's the right way to go ... however , our patches have been
>>> applied in our copy of trac @ trunk ? ... or is it still the previous
>>> one ?
>>>
>>> On 10/16/12, Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
>>>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>>> Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
>>>> Type: task | Status: accepted
>>>> Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
>>>> Component: trac core | Version:
>>>> Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
>>>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>>>
>>>> Comment (by gjm):fixed
>>>>
>>>> r1398858 updates vendor/current to trac 1.0 tag (trac:r11307)
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:3>
>>>> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
>>>> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Gary Martin
>> gary.martin@wandisco.com
>> gjm@apache.org
>>
>>
>
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
Posted by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com>.
JFTR ... environment upgrade needed . Is it a big deal ?
On 10/16/12, Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> That was just updating the copy in vendor/trac/current - I have
> subsequently tagged that version appropriately and merged the changes
> into trunk/trac which keeps our patches.
>
> There is only one error that I have noted for which I believe I have
> already found a fix. I will commit that in a second and I will update
> the list with the commit email for review.
>
> Cheers,
> Gary
>
> On 16/10/12 17:25, Olemis Lang wrote:
>> I think it's the right way to go ... however , our patches have been
>> applied in our copy of trac @ trunk ? ... or is it still the previous
>> one ?
>>
>> On 10/16/12, Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>> #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
>>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>> Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
>>> Type: task | Status: accepted
>>> Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
>>> Component: trac core | Version:
>>> Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
>>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>>
>>> Comment (by gjm):fixed
>>>
>>> r1398858 updates vendor/current to trac 1.0 tag (trac:r11307)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:3>
>>> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
>>> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Gary Martin
> gary.martin@wandisco.com
> gjm@apache.org
>
>
--
Regards,
Olemis.
Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
Featured article:
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
Posted by Gary Martin <ga...@wandisco.com>.
That was just updating the copy in vendor/trac/current - I have
subsequently tagged that version appropriately and merged the changes
into trunk/trac which keeps our patches.
There is only one error that I have noted for which I believe I have
already found a fix. I will commit that in a second and I will update
the list with the commit email for review.
Cheers,
Gary
On 16/10/12 17:25, Olemis Lang wrote:
> I think it's the right way to go ... however , our patches have been
> applied in our copy of trac @ trunk ? ... or is it still the previous
> one ?
>
> On 10/16/12, Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
>> #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>> Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
>> Type: task | Status: accepted
>> Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
>> Component: trac core | Version:
>> Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
>> ------------------------+-----------------------
>>
>> Comment (by gjm):fixed
>>
>> r1398858 updates vendor/current to trac 1.0 tag (trac:r11307)
>>
>> --
>> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:3>
>> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
>> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
>>
>
--
Gary Martin
gary.martin@wandisco.com
gjm@apache.org
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
Posted by Olemis Lang <ol...@gmail.com>.
I think it's the right way to go ... however , our patches have been
applied in our copy of trac @ trunk ? ... or is it still the previous
one ?
On 10/16/12, Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org> wrote:
> #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
> ------------------------+-----------------------
> Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
> Type: task | Status: accepted
> Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
> Component: trac core | Version:
> Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
> ------------------------+-----------------------
>
> Comment (by gjm):
>
> r1398858 updates vendor/current to trac 1.0 tag (trac:r11307)
>
> --
> Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:3>
> Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
> The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker
>
--
Regards,
Olemis.
Blog ES: http://simelo-es.blogspot.com/
Blog EN: http://simelo-en.blogspot.com/
Featured article:
Re: [Apache Bloodhound] #159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor
branch
Posted by Apache Bloodhound <bl...@incubator.apache.org>.
#159: Incorporate Trac 1.0 into vendor branch
------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: olemis | Owner: gjm
Type: task | Status: accepted
Priority: critical | Milestone: Release 3
Component: trac core | Version:
Resolution: | Keywords: vendor
------------------------+-----------------------
Comment (by gjm):
r1398858 updates vendor/current to trac 1.0 tag (trac:r11307)
--
Ticket URL: <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/159#comment:3>
Apache Bloodhound <https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/>
The Apache Bloodhound (incubating) issue tracker