You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@daffodil.apache.org by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org> on 2020/10/30 19:23:26 UTC
[VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by "Beckerle, Mike" <mb...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
+1
I verified that build from source works, that all internal tests, and integration tests pass, and that regression tests of the release against all known (to me) DFDL schemas pass.
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 1:23 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by Steve Lawrence <st...@gmail.com>.
Lola,
I just noticed the NOT OK on the rat check. The .bsp/ directory is a
generated file that is generated when you start sbt using the sbt
console, e.g.
$ sbt
> ratCheck
If instead you run it without the console, e.g.:
$ sbt ratCheck
then sbt doesn't generate this file and that ratCheck passes.
The ratCheck command is supposed to use the .gitignore file to ignore
file, which includes the .bsp directory, so I'm not sure why that isn't
working.
But this .bsp directory should just be ignored and doesn't affect the
rat results since it is auto generated. I'll create a ticket to get this
fixed so we can run ratCheck from the console, but I don't think is
considered a release stopper.
On 11/2/20 1:49 PM, Olabusayo Kilo wrote:
> +1
>
> I checked:
>
> [OK] links in email are correct
> [OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt and download)
> [OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
> [NOT OK] RAT check passes; .bsp/sbt.json file?
> [OK] ~50 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
>
> On 10/30/20 3:23 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating)
>> 3.0.0-rc1.
>>
>> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
>> found at:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
>>
>> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
>>
>>
>> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
>> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
>> file here:
>>
>> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>>
>> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
>>
>> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
>>
>> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
>>
>> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>>
>> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
>>
>> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
>> (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> - Steve
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by Olabusayo Kilo <ok...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
+1
I checked:
[OK] links in email are correct
[OK] verified Summary of Changes pages (maven, sbt and download)
[OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
[NOT OK] RAT check passes; .bsp/sbt.json file?
[OK] ~50 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
On 10/30/20 3:23 PM, Steve Lawrence wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
> found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
> corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
> file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
--
Best Regards,
Lola K.
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by Steve Lawrence <st...@gmail.com>.
+1
I checked:
[OK] incubating in name
[OK] hashes and signatures of source and helper binaries are correct
[OK] signature of git tag is correct
[OK] source release matches git tag (minus KEYS file)
[OK] source compiles and all tests pass (both en_US and de_DE LANG)
[OK] jars in helper binaries and the repository are exactly the same
[OK] src, bins, and jars include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
[OK] RAT check passes
[OK] no unexpected binaries in source
[OK] jars built from source have the same content as helper binary jars
[OK] distributed dependencies in helper binaries are same as from maven
[OK] rpm and msi install and run
[OK] ~50 public and private DFDL schema projects pass tests
[OK] JavaDoc and ScalaDoc are correct
On 11/1/20 11:07 PM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> +1
>
> Everything looks okay in my cursory review. The presence of "daffodil-lib-<VERSION>" strings in the LICENSE and NOTICE files are not a mistake; they are a deliberate decision to reduce the number of places where the Daffodil version must be changed to only one file (build.sbt).
>
> I checked:
>
> [OK] incubating in name
> [OK] no unexpected differences between 3.0.0 unpacked bin and 2.7.0 unpacked bin
> [OK] tgz and zip have same contents
> [OK] src has same contents as my git checkout (minus KEYS file)
> [OK] src and bins include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
> [OK] no binaries in source
> [OK] JavaDocs and ScalaDocs look correct
>
> Can we update the "Unsupported Features" page (https://daffodil.apache.org/unsupported/) for any changes in Daffodil 3.0.0 as well? We might want to add this page to the release workflow (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Release+Workflow) as part of the "Update the Website" section.
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:23 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>.
Mike updated the unsupported page in in preparation for this release:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-daffodil-site/commit/8c9d65b641b4a6447b6f1e96acc788a9a8cd2071
I've confirmed that it all looks accurate.
I've also updated the wiki to mention updating this page.
Thanks!
- Steve
On 11/1/20 11:07 PM, Interrante, John A (GE Research, US) wrote:
> +1
>
> Everything looks okay in my cursory review. The presence of "daffodil-lib-<VERSION>" strings in the LICENSE and NOTICE files are not a mistake; they are a deliberate decision to reduce the number of places where the Daffodil version must be changed to only one file (build.sbt).
>
> I checked:
>
> [OK] incubating in name
> [OK] no unexpected differences between 3.0.0 unpacked bin and 2.7.0 unpacked bin
> [OK] tgz and zip have same contents
> [OK] src has same contents as my git checkout (minus KEYS file)
> [OK] src and bins include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
> [OK] no binaries in source
> [OK] JavaDocs and ScalaDocs look correct
>
> Can we update the "Unsupported Features" page (https://daffodil.apache.org/unsupported/) for any changes in Daffodil 3.0.0 as well? We might want to add this page to the release workflow (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Release+Workflow) as part of the "Update the Website" section.
>
> John
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:23 PM
> To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
> Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
>
> All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
>
> Staging artifacts can be found at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
>
> This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
>
> https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
>
> The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
>
> For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
>
> https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
>
> For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
>
> https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
>
> Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Thanks,
> - Steve
>
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by "Interrante, John A (GE Research, US)" <in...@research.ge.com>.
+1
Everything looks okay in my cursory review. The presence of "daffodil-lib-<VERSION>" strings in the LICENSE and NOTICE files are not a mistake; they are a deliberate decision to reduce the number of places where the Daffodil version must be changed to only one file (build.sbt).
I checked:
[OK] incubating in name
[OK] no unexpected differences between 3.0.0 unpacked bin and 2.7.0 unpacked bin
[OK] tgz and zip have same contents
[OK] src has same contents as my git checkout (minus KEYS file)
[OK] src and bins include correct LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER
[OK] no binaries in source
[OK] JavaDocs and ScalaDocs look correct
Can we update the "Unsupported Features" page (https://daffodil.apache.org/unsupported/) for any changes in Daffodil 3.0.0 as well? We might want to add this page to the release workflow (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/DAFFODIL/Release+Workflow) as part of the "Update the Website" section.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:23 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org
Subject: EXT: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661, corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours (Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by "Adams, Joshua" <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
Voting again since my first vote got moderated (forgot to add my updated email address).
+1
Checked:
[OK] "incubating" in name
[OK] tgz and zip files contain the same files
[OK] Verified all signatures
[OK] Source builds and tests as expected
[OK] No prebuilt binaries in src
Josh Adams
________________________________
From: Adams, Joshua <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>
Sent: Monday, November 2, 2020 1:33 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
+1
Checked:
[OK] "incubating" in name
[OK] tgz and zip files contain the same files
[OK] Verified all signatures
[OK] Source builds and tests as expected
[OK] No prebuilt binaries in src
Josh Adams
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:23 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Posted by "Adams, Joshua" <ja...@owlcyberdefense.com>.
+1
Checked:
[OK] "incubating" in name
[OK] tgz and zip files contain the same files
[OK] Verified all signatures
[OK] Source builds and tests as expected
[OK] No prebuilt binaries in src
Josh Adams
________________________________
From: Steve Lawrence <sl...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 3:23 PM
To: dev@daffodil.apache.org <de...@daffodil.apache.org>
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1
Hi all,
I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Daffodil (incubating) 3.0.0-rc1.
All distribution packages, including signatures, digests, etc. can be
found at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/daffodil/3.0.0-rc1/
Staging artifacts can be found at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachedaffodil-1019/
This release has been signed with PGP key 36F3494B033AE661,
corresponding to slawrence@apache.org, which is included in the KEYS
file here:
https://downloads.apache.org/incubator/daffodil/KEYS
The release candidate has been tagged in git with v3.0.0-rc1.
For reference, here is a list of all closed JIRAs tagged with 3.0.0:
https://s.apache.org/daffodil-issues-3.0.0
For a summary of the changes in this release, see:
https://daffodil.apache.org/releases/3.0.0/
Please review and vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
(Monday, 2 November 2020, 3:30 EST).
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
- Steve