You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@camel.apache.org by "Claus Ibsen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/12/28 12:50:05 UTC

[jira] Updated: (CAMEL-772) Predicates with two types should consider casting to desired type before evaluating

     [ https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Claus Ibsen updated CAMEL-772:
------------------------------

    Attachment: CAMEL-772.patch

A patch

> Predicates with two types should consider casting to desired type before evaluating
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CAMEL-772
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/activemq/browse/CAMEL-772
>             Project: Apache Camel
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: camel-core
>    Affects Versions: 1.4.0
>            Reporter: Claus Ibsen
>            Assignee: Claus Ibsen
>             Fix For: 2.0.0
>
>         Attachments: CAMEL-772.patch
>
>
> I had this unit test where I want to assert that the message body contains this string part
> {code}
>         MockEndpoint error = getMockEndpoint("mock:errorQueue");
>         error.expectedMessageCount(1);
>         error.message(0).body().contains("<patientCpr>0101701234</patientCpr>");
> {code}
> But the expression fails because the body is byte array and is not casted to String as the contains type is.
> If I change the code to:
> {code}
>         error.message(0).body().convertTo(String.class).contains("<patientCpr>0101701234</patientCpr>");
> {code}
> Then it of course works. But what if there already is a type convert in Camel that could have done the cast for me?
> But is it dangerous to add such automatic type casting behind the end-users back? Any thoughts?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.