createPostalAddress

["skip@theDevers" <sk...@thedevers.org>]

There is a createPostalAddress in ContactMechServices.java

There is also a simple one ContactMechServices.xml.

In party services:

    <service name="createPostalAddress" engine="simple"
            location="org/ofbiz/party/contact/ContactMechServices.xml"
invoke="createPostalAddress" auth="true">

My question is why is there two and is there a way (beyond modifying the
servicedef) to call the java guy?

I like the java guy because it does a security check for _PCM_CREATE.

Skip

Re: createPostalAddress

[Adrian Crum <ad...@hlmksw.com>]

I hope to have most of the party manager changes committed by the end of the weekend.

Jacques Le Roux wrote:

> De : "Adrian Crum" <ad...@hlmksw.com>
> 
>>Skip,
>>
>>It would be best to use the existing service. I am in the process of moving the embedded permission 
>>checks to the permission services - which should correct the difference, PLUS it will enable custom 
>>apps to piggyback custom permissions to the service.
>>
>>-Adrian
> 
> 
> In the meantime it's easy to add a permission in  ContactMechServices.xml
> 
> Jacques
> 
> 
>>skip@theDevers wrote:
>>
>>
>>>There is a createPostalAddress in ContactMechServices.java
>>>
>>>There is also a simple one ContactMechServices.xml.
>>>
>>>In party services:
>>>
>>>    <service name="createPostalAddress" engine="simple"
>>>            location="org/ofbiz/party/contact/ContactMechServices.xml"
>>>invoke="createPostalAddress" auth="true">
>>>
>>>My question is why is there two and is there a way (beyond modifying the
>>>servicedef) to call the java guy?
>>>
>>>I like the java guy because it does a security check for _PCM_CREATE.
>>>
>>>Skip
>>>
>>>
>>
> 

Re: createPostalAddress

[Jacques Le Roux <ja...@les7arts.com>]

De : "Adrian Crum" <ad...@hlmksw.com>
> Skip,
> 
> It would be best to use the existing service. I am in the process of moving the embedded permission 
> checks to the permission services - which should correct the difference, PLUS it will enable custom 
> apps to piggyback custom permissions to the service.
> 
> -Adrian

In the meantime it's easy to add a permission in  ContactMechServices.xml

Jacques

> skip@theDevers wrote:
> 
> > There is a createPostalAddress in ContactMechServices.java
> > 
> > There is also a simple one ContactMechServices.xml.
> > 
> > In party services:
> > 
> >     <service name="createPostalAddress" engine="simple"
> >             location="org/ofbiz/party/contact/ContactMechServices.xml"
> > invoke="createPostalAddress" auth="true">
> > 
> > My question is why is there two and is there a way (beyond modifying the
> > servicedef) to call the java guy?
> > 
> > I like the java guy because it does a security check for _PCM_CREATE.
> > 
> > Skip
> > 
> > 
> 

Re: createPostalAddress

[Adrian Crum <ad...@hlmksw.com>]

Skip,

It would be best to use the existing service. I am in the process of moving the embedded permission 
checks to the permission services - which should correct the difference, PLUS it will enable custom 
apps to piggyback custom permissions to the service.

-Adrian

skip@theDevers wrote:

> There is a createPostalAddress in ContactMechServices.java
> 
> There is also a simple one ContactMechServices.xml.
> 
> In party services:
> 
>     <service name="createPostalAddress" engine="simple"
>             location="org/ofbiz/party/contact/ContactMechServices.xml"
> invoke="createPostalAddress" auth="true">
> 
> My question is why is there two and is there a way (beyond modifying the
> servicedef) to call the java guy?
> 
> I like the java guy because it does a security check for _PCM_CREATE.
> 
> Skip
> 
>