You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by kf...@collab.net on 2003/08/14 18:16:22 UTC
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com> writes:
> AFAIK, all I deleted from the config file was the line which _added_ a
> Reply-To header for the list. It shouldn't munge any headers added by
> a MUA.
Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
everything's fine :-).
(I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
the latter.)
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Vincent Lefevre <vi...@vinc17.org> writes:
> I don't see this header on this message from kfogel@collab.net.
>
> I think that you saw it because you received the private copy
> (you were in the To field).
Yes -- sorry, I didn't anticipate that bit of confusion!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Vincent Lefevre <vi...@vinc17.org>.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56 -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
>
> > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > > everything's fine :-).
> > >
> > > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > > the latter.)
> >
> > Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
>
> I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
> to:
>
> Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
I don't see this header on this message from kfogel@collab.net.
I think that you saw it because you received the private copy
(you were in the To field).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vi...@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/> - 100%
validated (X)HTML - Acorn Risc PC, Yellow Pig 17, Championnat International
des Jeux Mathématiques et Logiques, TETRHEX, etc.
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Michael Wood <mw...@its.uct.ac.za> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> >
> > > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > > > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > > > everything's fine :-).
> > > >
> > > > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > > > the latter.)
> > >
> > > Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
> >
> > I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
> > to:
> >
> > Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
>
> That's because he sent it to you AND the mailing list. The copy that I
> got from the mailing list DOES NOT have the header. :)
>
> Hope that clears things up.
Yes, thanks Michael.
--
Daniel Rall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Michael Wood <mw...@its.uct.ac.za>.
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
>
> > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > > everything's fine :-).
> > >
> > > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > > the latter.)
> >
> > Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
>
> I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
> to:
>
> Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
That's because he sent it to you AND the mailing list. The copy that I
got from the mailing list DOES NOT have the header. :)
Hope that clears things up.
--
Michael Wood <mw...@its.uct.ac.za>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Andreas Guenther <ag...@collab.net>.
I changed the configuration so that the 'reply-to' header isn't munged anymore. The only exception remains issues@ as per Karl's comment, which still points to dev@.
-Andreas
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 09:14:37AM -0500, kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Andreas Guenther <ag...@collab.net> writes:
> > Below you'll see the current settings in regards to the Reply-To header for each list:
> >
> > [announce@subversion]
> > Reply-To: users@subversion
> >
> > [committers@subversion]
> > Reply-To: committers@subversion
> >
> > [dev@subversion]
> > Reply-To: SENDER
> >
> > [issues@subversion]
> > Reply-To: dev@subversion
> >
> > [svn@subversion]
> > Reply-To: SENDER
> >
> > [users@subversion]
> > Reply-To header is completely stripped
> >
> > I will talk to Karl about the above settings and correct them accordingly.
>
> I assume by "SENDER" you just mean that the Reply-to is left however
> the sender set it (and if there is no Reply-to, none is added). That
> is the correct setting for every list above, except 'issues', which
> can remain 'dev'. [Although even then, the preferable way to
> implement would be for the issue tracker itself to set Reply-to to
> 'dev', and for the mailing list to leave it alone... However, I'm not
> going to quibble :-).]
>
> Thanks, Andreas. I have login on tigris.org, but looking at those
> conf files, I have the strong feeling that I'd be more likely to mess
> this up than get it right.
>
> -Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
Andreas Guenther <ag...@collab.net> writes:
> Below you'll see the current settings in regards to the Reply-To header for each list:
>
> [announce@subversion]
> Reply-To: users@subversion
>
> [committers@subversion]
> Reply-To: committers@subversion
>
> [dev@subversion]
> Reply-To: SENDER
>
> [issues@subversion]
> Reply-To: dev@subversion
>
> [svn@subversion]
> Reply-To: SENDER
>
> [users@subversion]
> Reply-To header is completely stripped
>
> I will talk to Karl about the above settings and correct them accordingly.
I assume by "SENDER" you just mean that the Reply-to is left however
the sender set it (and if there is no Reply-to, none is added). That
is the correct setting for every list above, except 'issues', which
can remain 'dev'. [Although even then, the preferable way to
implement would be for the issue tracker itself to set Reply-to to
'dev', and for the mailing list to leave it alone... However, I'm not
going to quibble :-).]
Thanks, Andreas. I have login on tigris.org, but looking at those
conf files, I have the strong feeling that I'd be more likely to mess
this up than get it right.
-Karl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Julian Foad <ju...@btopenworld.com>.
Daniel Rall wrote:
> Okay, so munging of other messages was due to some necessary
> maintainence on tigris.org.
I don't understand this or Andreas' comment to which you are responding. Messages other than which? By "munging" are you referring to removal of the "Reply-To" header? And is the issue that we are talking about ("users" list consistently removing "Reply-To" headers) fundamentally affected by this, or are you just saying that some messages have also been munged for other reasons which might cause confusion when looking for evidence? I have not heard mention of other munging problems.
> Andreas Guenther <ag...@collab.net> writes:
>
>>Messages that had to be resent because of stale mbox files will contain the list address and lead to the assumption that lists are not working the anticipated way. It would be too much effort to fix message that need to be resent to have the original sender in the Reply-To header.
If this comment was valid, then what is a "stale mbox file" on this context - an individual subscriber's mail server that is not currently accepting mail from the list server? And did you mean that "messages ... will contain the list address" in their "Reply-To" header?
- Julian
>>On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
>>
>>>kfogel@collab.net writes:
>>>
>>>>kfogel@collab.net writes:
>>>>
>>>>>Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
>>>>>everything's fine :-).
>>>>>
>>>>>(I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
>>>>>the latter.)
>>>>
>>>>Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
>>>
>>>I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
>>>to:
>>>
>>>Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
Okay, so munging of other messages was due to some necessary
maintainence on tigris.org.
Andreas Guenther <ag...@collab.net> writes:
> Messages that had to be resent because of stale mbox files will contain the list address and lead to the assumption that lists are not working the anticipated way. It would be too much effort to fix message that need to be resent to have the original sender in the Reply-To header.
>
> -Andreas
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> >
> > > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > > > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > > > everything's fine :-).
> > > >
> > > > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > > > the latter.)
> > >
> > > Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
> >
> > I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
> > to:
> >
> > Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Andreas Guenther <ag...@collab.net>.
Messages that had to be resent because of stale mbox files will contain the list address and lead to the assumption that lists are not working the anticipated way. It would be too much effort to fix message that need to be resent to have the original sender in the Reply-To header.
-Andreas
On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 12:29:56PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
>
> > kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > > everything's fine :-).
> > >
> > > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > > the latter.)
> >
> > Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
>
> I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
> to:
>
> Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
> --
>
> Daniel Rall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by Daniel Rall <dl...@finemaltcoding.com>.
kfogel@collab.net writes:
> kfogel@collab.net writes:
> > Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> > everything's fine :-).
> >
> > (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> > the latter.)
>
> Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
I'm confused, I see the following header on the message I'm replying
to:
Reply-To: kfogel@collab.net
--
Daniel Rall
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: "users" list is removing "Reply-To" header
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
kfogel@collab.net writes:
> Well, if this mail has a "Reply-to: kfogel@collab.net" header, then
> everything's fine :-).
>
> (I've deliberately switched the thread from 'dev' to 'users' to test
> the latter.)
Nope, not present, so 'users' is stripping Reply-to: headers :-(.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org