Load Issues with SA 3.0pre

[Jeff Koch <je...@intersessions.com>]

Hi Michael:

We tried the new Bayes SQL DB system (with new empty tables) and the load
was high. Then we tried using the site-wide Bayes DB that had been built by
2.63 and the load was high. We also tried it with Bayes off completely with
no change so we turned that back on. Scans were taking as much as 30 to 40
seconds. Server load averaged around 6.00. Now that we're back on 2.64
scans are taking the more normal 1 to 2 seconds and the server load is
under 1.00.

One thing I noticed was that the maillog showed more detail with 3.0 - it
showed all the tests being done. Maybe the SURBL tests take too long or
require too much memory. Also, is it possible that SPF is automatically
enabled?

Here's an example:


Aug  5 06:07:29 mx10 spamd[9352]: connection from localhost.localdomain
[127.0.0.1] at por
t 49365
Aug  5 06:07:29 mx10 spamd[9352]: processing message 
<27883209439.10756589404036256915@jun
eisp.biz> for texaswolf@wpxxx.com:0.
Aug  5 06:07:35 mx10 spamd[9352]: identified spam (25.2/5.0) for 
texaswolf@wpxxx.com:0 in
   5.9 seconds, 3303 bytes.
Aug  5 06:07:35 mx10 spamd[9352]: result: Y 25 - 
BAYES_75,BIZ_TLD,CLICK_BELOW,CLICK_TO_REM
OVE_1,EXCUSE_10,EXCUSE_15,EXCUSE_3,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,HTML_20_30,HTML_FONT_BIG,HTML_FONT_INV
ISIBLE,HTML_LINK_CLICK_HERE,HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TEXT_AFTER_BODY,HTML_WEB_BUGS,LINES_OF_YELLI
NG,LONGWORDS,MIME_HTML_ONLY,RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100,RAZOR2_CHECK,RCVD_BY_IP,RCVD_HELO_IP_MI
SMATCH,RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO,REMOVE_FROM_LIST,SEE_FOR_YOURSELF,URIBL_AB_SURBL,URIBL_OB_SURBL,U
RIBL_SBL,URIBL_SC_SURBL,URIBL_WS_SURBL,URI_REDIRECTOR,WE_HONOR_ALL
scantime=5.9,size=3303,
mid=<27...@juneisp.biz>,bayes=0.788341699558233,autolearn=spam 




Best Regards,

Jeff Koch, Intersessions